Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.

Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Behavioral Medicine Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 930 - 940
Main Authors: Wagner, Glenn J., Matovu, Joseph K. B., Juncker, Margrethe, Namisango, Eve, Bouskill, Kathryn, Nakami, Sylvia, Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly, Luyirika, Emmanuel, Bogart, Laura M., Green, Harold D., Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
Format: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=172971204&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 172971204
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01607715
        JBM
      jtl: Journal of Behavioral Medicine
      issn: 01607715
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        172971204
        171916549
        172971204
        172971204
        10.1007/s10865-023-00418-6
        172971204
      ppf: 930
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Effects of a peer advocacy intervention on cervical cancer screening among social network members: results of a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.
      aug:
        au:
          Wagner, Glenn J.
          Matovu, Joseph K. B.
          Juncker, Margrethe
          Namisango, Eve
          Bouskill, Kathryn
          Nakami, Sylvia
          Beyeza-Kashesya, Jolly
          Luyirika, Emmanuel
          Bogart, Laura M.
          Green, Harold D.
          Wanyenze, Rhoda K.
        affil: https://ror.org/00f2z7n96 RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, 90407, Santa Monica, CA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Cervix Neoplasms Prevention and Control
          Cancer Screening Uganda
          Social Networks
          Patient Advocacy
          Peer Group
          Human
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Funding Source
          Uganda
          Multiple Regression
          Multivariate Analysis
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
      ab: Cervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among women in Uganda, yet lifetime CC screening is as low as 5%. Training women who have screened for CC to engage in peer advocacy could increase uptake of CC screening in social networks. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a peer-facilitated, manualized, 7-session group intervention to train women to engage in CC prevention advocacy. Forty women recently screened for CC (index participants) enrolled and were assigned to receive the intervention (n = 20) or wait-list control (n = 20). Each index was asked to recruit up to three female social network members (alters) who had not been screened for CC (n = 103 enrolled alters). All index and alter participants were assessed at baseline and month-6 follow-up. All but one (n = 39; 98%) index and 98 (95%) alter participants completed the month 6 assessment. In multivariate regression models controlling for baseline outcome measures and demographic covariates, intervention alters were more likely to have been screened for CC at month 6 [67% vs. 16%; adjusted OR (95% CI) = 12.13 (4.07, 36.16)], compared to control alters. Data also revealed significant increased engagement in CC prevention advocacy, among both index and alter participants in the intervention group at month 6, compared to the control group. The intervention was highly effective in increasing CC screening uptake among social network members, and engagement in CC prevention advocacy among not only intervention recipients, but also targets of advocacy, suggesting the potential for wide dissemination of CC knowledge. Trial Registration. NIH Clinical Trial Registry NCT04960748 (clinicaltrials.gov).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N