Crossing Levels: Meta-induction and the Problem of Induction.
Gerhard Schurz claims to have a solution to Hume's problem of induction based on results from machine learning concerning meta-induction. His argument has two steps. The first is to establish a justification for following a certain meta-inductive strategy based on its predictive optimality. The seco...
| Published in: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 985 - 994 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
Oct2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173151296&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173151296 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2023 vid: 90 iid: 4 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 173151296 10.1017/psa.2023.2 ppf: 985 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 114KB tig: atl: Crossing Levels: Meta-induction and the Problem of Induction. aug: au: Henderson, Leah affil: Department of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712GL Groningen, The Netherlands su: Machine learning Induced ovulation Argument sug: subj: Machine learning Induced ovulation Argument ab: Gerhard Schurz claims to have a solution to Hume's problem of induction based on results from machine learning concerning meta-induction. His argument has two steps. The first is to establish a justification for following a certain meta-inductive strategy based on its predictive optimality. The second step is to show how this justification can be transferred to object-induction. I unpack the second step and fail to find a convincing argument supporting the transfer of justification from meta-induction to object-induction. My conclusion is that the problem of induction has not yet been solved by appeal to meta-induction. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|