The Temporal Asymmetry of Influence Is Not Statistical.
I argue that the temporal asymmetry of influence is not merely the result of thermodynamics: it is a consequence of the fact that the modal structure of the universe must admit only processes that cannot give rise to contradictions. I appeal to the process matrix formalism developed in the field of...
| Published in: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 855 - 880 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
Oct2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173151299&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173151299 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2023 vid: 90 iid: 4 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 173151299 10.1017/psa.2023.55 ppf: 855 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 257KB tig: atl: The Temporal Asymmetry of Influence Is Not Statistical. aug: au: Adlam, Emily affil: The Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA su: Free will & determinism Prices Contradiction sug: subj: Free will & determinism Prices Contradiction ab: I argue that the temporal asymmetry of influence is not merely the result of thermodynamics: it is a consequence of the fact that the modal structure of the universe must admit only processes that cannot give rise to contradictions. I appeal to the process matrix formalism developed in the field of quantum foundations to characterize processes that are compatible with local free will while ruling out contradictions, and I argue that this gives rise to "consistent-chaining" requirements that explain the temporal asymmetry of influence. I compare this view to the perspectival account of causation advocated by Price and Ramsey. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|