Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review.
Sports settings have been identified as an ideal place to conduct complex multi-level health-promotion interventions, with the potential to engage a broad audience. Whilst the benefits of delivering health-promotion interventions in sports settings are well documented, such interventions' real-world...
| Published in: | Health Promotion International Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 1 - 15 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Oct2023
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=173339107&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 173339107 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09574824 F9Y jtl: Health Promotion International issn: 09574824 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2023 vid: 38 iid: 5 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 173339107 173339107 173339107 10.1093/heapro/daad114 173339107 ppf: 1 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Process evaluations of health-promotion interventions in sports settings: a systematic review. aug: au: Lim, Angie S X Schweickle, Matthew J Liddelow, Caitlin Liddle, Sarah K Vella, Stewart A affil: Global Alliance for Mental Health and Sport, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong , Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522 , Australia sug: subj: Health Promotion Evaluation Program Evaluation Methods Implementation Science Sports Human Systematic Review Medline Psycinfo PubMed Health Education Reproducibility of Results ab: Sports settings have been identified as an ideal place to conduct complex multi-level health-promotion interventions, with the potential to engage a broad audience. Whilst the benefits of delivering health-promotion interventions in sports settings are well documented, such interventions' real-world implementation and success must be better understood. Process evaluations can be conducted to provide information related to an intervention's fidelity, replication, scaling, adoption, and the underlying mechanisms driving outcomes. This systematic review summarizes how process evaluations of health-promotion interventions are conducted in sports settings and highlight facilitators and barriers to health-promotion intervention delivery using narrative synthesis. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, searches included original peer-reviewed articles from inception—January 2023. We searched eight electronic databases: Academic Search Complete; MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES; PsycINFO; SPORTSDiscus with Full Text; MEDLINE; SCOPUS; Pub Med, and Pro Quest Central. Thirty-two studies were included. Findings suggest that most process evaluations of health-promotion interventions have acknowledged the inherent complexity of sports settings, and investigated factors that explain their intervention's success (e.g. trust building, engagement). However, poor use of process evaluation frameworks or guidelines resulted in wide variations of how process evaluations are conducted and reported, which made findings difficult to integrate and standardize with consistency. Accordingly, this review provides a guide on how future process evaluations can be conducted to improve health-promotion interventions' transparency, replicability and reliability in real-world settings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|