Against 'Hate Speech'.
This article argues against the term and concept of 'hate speech' and in favour of using the concept and term 'discriminatory speech'. 'Hate speech' is a misnomer; we should name the harmful speech in question by what it in fact does: it discriminates. The article argues for this conceptual replacem...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 813 - 836 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173438994&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173438994 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02643758 BQ0 jtl: Journal of Applied Philosophy issn: 02643758 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2023 vid: 40 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 173438994 10.1111/japp.12648 ppf: 813 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 333KB tig: atl: Against 'Hate Speech'. aug: au: Kindermann, Dirk affil: University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria su: Hate speech Number concept Hate sug: subj: Hate speech Number concept Hate ab: This article argues against the term and concept of 'hate speech' and in favour of using the concept and term 'discriminatory speech'. 'Hate speech' is a misnomer; we should name the harmful speech in question by what it in fact does: it discriminates. The article argues for this conceptual replacement claim by identifying a number of functions the concept 'hate speech' has been meant to serve and by arguing that extant concepts of hate speech have not served this function well. Roughly, they do not serve the functions well because of five properties of hate speech: hate centricity, perpetrator centricity, intention centricity, emotion centricity, and individual centricity. The article then proposes a definition of discriminatory speech and argues that it fulfils the conceptual functions better. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Applied Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Applied Philosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|