Individual, interpersonal and environmental correlates of sedentary behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities.

Background: Sedentary behaviours have adverse health outcomes and adults with intellectual disabilities are at a higher risk of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. The lack of knowledge relating to sedentary behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities has impeded the development of effective int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Vol. 67; no. 12; pp. 1237 - 1249
Autores principales: Chusamer, K., Melville, C. A., McGarty, A. M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=173485424&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 173485424
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09642633
        EUL
      jtl: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
      issn: 09642633
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 67
      iid: 12
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        173485424
        161733785
        173485424
        173485424
        10.1111/jir.13014
        173485424
      ppf: 1237
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Individual, interpersonal and environmental correlates of sedentary behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities.
      aug:
        au:
          Chusamer, K.
          Melville, C. A.
          McGarty, A. M.
        affil: Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Intellectual Disability Physiopathology
          Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Social Behavior
          Sedentary Behavior
          Individuality
          Interpersonal Relations
          Social Environment
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          United Kingdom
          Secondary Analysis
          Surveys
          Interviews
          Correlational Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Economic Status
          Employment Status
          Multiple Logistic Regression
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Neighborhood Characteristics
          Leisure Activities
          Television
          Screen Time
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Sedentary behaviours have adverse health outcomes and adults with intellectual disabilities are at a higher risk of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. The lack of knowledge relating to sedentary behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities has impeded the development of effective interventions. This study aimed to investigate individual, interpersonal and environmental correlates that are associated with sedentary behaviours in adults with intellectual disabilities. Method: A secondary analysis of data from The UK Household Longitudinal Study (Understanding Society; collected 2011–2013) was conducted. Twenty‐two predictor variables were included in a stepwise logistic regression, with TV hours during weekdays (≤3 and >3 h/day) used as a proxy for sedentary behaviours. A sample of 266 adults, with mean age of 37.9 and range from 18 to 49 years old, with intellectual disabilities were identified. Because 63.9% were female, 62.4% had children and 28.2% were employed, the sample is likely to be most representative of more able adults with intellectual disabilities. Results: A significant interaction term between having children and neighbourhood status was found in the initial model so separate models for good and poor‐quality neighbourhoods are reported. Having children only had a significant effect to lower the odds of high TV time among participants living in good quality neighbourhoods (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03, 0.25). However, for people living in poor quality neighbourhoods it was better quality leisure services that was associated with lower odds of high TV time (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23, 0.90). Being employed only significantly reduced the odds of high TV time in the good quality neighbourhood model (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12, 0.78). These effects highlight the importance of environmental effects on lifestyle behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities. Conclusions: Future research should aim to expand our understanding of environmental effects on the sedentary behaviours and other lifestyle behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N