Does reflective equilibrium help us converge?
I address the worry that reflective equilibrium is too weak as an account of justification because it fails to let differing views converge. I take up informal aspects of convergence and operationalise them in a formal model of reflective equilibrium. This allows for exploration by the means of comp...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 202; no. 6; pp. 1 - 23 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173653497&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173653497 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2023 vid: 202 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 173653497 10.1007/s11229-023-04375-0 ppf: 1 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: Does reflective equilibrium help us converge? aug: au: Freivogel, Andreas affil: https://ror.org/02k7v4d05 Institute of Philosophy, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 49a, 3012, Bern, Switzerland su: Equilibrium Computer simulation Relativity sug: subj: Equilibrium Computer simulation Relativity keyword: Convergence Formal modelling Reflective equilibrium Simulation study ab: I address the worry that reflective equilibrium is too weak as an account of justification because it fails to let differing views converge. I take up informal aspects of convergence and operationalise them in a formal model of reflective equilibrium. This allows for exploration by the means of computer simulation. Findings show that the formal model does not yield unique outputs, but still boosts agreement. I conclude from this that reflective equilibrium is best seen as a pluralist account of justification that cannot be accused of resulting in an "anything goes" relativism. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|