The Imperceptible Cost of Eliminating Spam.

The article responds to the comments by David Jameson related to the article "Spam, Spim, and Spit," published in the April 2005 issue of the periodical "Communications of the ACM," concerning the disadvantages of challenge/ response (C/R) email systems. The best test of the idea will be to observe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Communications of the ACM Vol. 48; no. 6; p. 12
Autor principal: Cerf, Vinton
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Computing Machinery Jun2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The article responds to the comments by David Jameson related to the article "Spam, Spim, and Spit," published in the April 2005 issue of the periodical "Communications of the ACM," concerning the disadvantages of challenge/ response (C/R) email systems. The best test of the idea will be to observe its uptake in the community of users and the interest shown by email client and server software developers in incorporating it into their systems. It is believed that some users will find it so annoying they'll stop using it, particularly if it involves repeated confirmation requests, perhaps from everyone on a distribution list. The other problem is that "From" addresses are easily spoofed, so a whitelist created with confirmed sources might still allow the Spam to get through.