The topology of persons, and surviving to some degree.

Braddon-Mitchell and Miller put forward the claim that the relation of being-the-same-person is gradable: a person can be the same person tomorrow as today, but only half the same. To justify their thesis, they propose a model of persons that is intended to be metaphysically neutral. This article se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 202; no. 6; pp. 1 - 38
Autores principales: Skowron, Bartłomiej, Kąkol, Tomasz, Król, Zbigniew
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173874560&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 173874560
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 202
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        173874560
        10.1007/s11229-023-04406-w
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 37
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 701KB
      tig:
        atl: The topology of persons, and surviving to some degree.
      aug:
        au:
          Skowron, Bartłomiej
          Kąkol, Tomasz
          Król, Zbigniew
        affil:
          https://ror.org/00y0xnp53 Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661, Warsaw, Poland
          https://ror.org/011dv8m48 Institut of Philosophy, University of Gdańsk, Jana Bażyńskiego 4, 80-309, Gdańsk, Poland
      sug:
      keyword:
        Being-the-same-person relation
        Ontology of person
        Topological explanations
        Topology of person
      ab: Braddon-Mitchell and Miller put forward the claim that the relation of being-the-same-person is gradable: a person can be the same person tomorrow as today, but only half the same. To justify their thesis, they propose a model of persons that is intended to be metaphysically neutral. This article sets out to show that such a model implicitly contains strong metaphysical assumptions that run contrary to the authors’ own statements. Using Roman Ingarden’s phenomenological ontology, we aim to demonstrate that within the model in question persons exist intentionally, where this leads to a caricature rather than an adequate account of persons. In opposition to Braddon-Mitchell and Miller, we argue that the justification presented for the thesis of the gradability of the relation of being-the-same-person in fact makes it reasonable to demand that an adequate model of persons be posited. We present Kurt Lewin’s holistic topological-dynamic model, and show that in this context it is not being-the-same-person that is gradable, but rather the characteristic (of persons) that is dimension. Thus, we reject the thesis of the gradability of the relation of being-the-same-person involved in personal identity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N