Subjective and neural reactivity during savoring and rumination.
Repetitive thinking about negative emotions or events is strongly associated with worse mental health, whereas repetitive positive thought is generally believed to be beneficial. This observation is at odds with the idea that all forms of repetitive thinking share underlying neural mechanisms. To re...
| Publicado en: | Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 1568 - 1581 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=173894055&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 173894055 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15307026 NA4 jtl: Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience issn: 15307026 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2023 vid: 23 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 173894055 172019320 10.3758/s13415-023-01123-2 173894055 ppf: 1568 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Subjective and neural reactivity during savoring and rumination. aug: au: Brandeis, Benjamin O. Siegle, Greg J. Franzen, Peter Soehner, Adriene Hasler, Brant McMakin, Dana Young, Kym Buysse, Daniel J. affil: https://ror.org/02ydh7m84 Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, USA sug: ab: Repetitive thinking about negative emotions or events is strongly associated with worse mental health, whereas repetitive positive thought is generally believed to be beneficial. This observation is at odds with the idea that all forms of repetitive thinking share underlying neural mechanisms. To resolve this apparent discrepancy, the present study examined relationships between subjective affect and neural mechanisms during periods of sustained processing of positive (savoring) and negative (rumination) emotion. We also examined potential common moderators of savoring and rumination including memory specificity and sleep quality. Results indicated that individuals who experience high positive affect during savoring also are likely to experience more intense negative affect during rumination. fMRI-derived brain activity revealed common mechanisms of rumination and savoring. Memory specificity had common effects on neural correlates of rumination and savoring; sleep quality was not associated with mechanisms of savoring or rumination. These results suggest that repetitive engagement with positive and negative affect is similar both subjectively and mechanistically. Clinical interventions for rumination may benefit from capitalizing on preserved capacity for savoring. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|