Predicting Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric ICU.

BACKGROUND: Timely ventilator liberation can prevent morbidities associated with invasive mechanical ventilation in the pediatric ICU (PICU). There currently exists no standard benchmark for duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the PICU. This study sought to develop and validate a multi-ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 68; no. 12; pp. 1623 - 1631
Autores principales: Rogerson, Colin M., Abu-Sultaneh, Samer, Loberger, Jeremy M., Ross, Patrick, Khemani, Robinder G., Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson
Formato: CEU research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Dec2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=173910574&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 173910574
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 68
      iid: 12
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        173910574
        173910574
        173910574
        10.4187/respcare.11015
        173910574
      ppf: 1623
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Predicting Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric ICU.
      aug:
        au:
          Rogerson, Colin M.
          Abu-Sultaneh, Samer
          Loberger, Jeremy M.
          Ross, Patrick
          Khemani, Robinder G.
          Sanchez-Pinto, L. Nelson
        affil: Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiratory Failure Therapy
          Respiration, Artificial Standards
          Invasive Procedures Standards
          Treatment Duration Standards
          Machine Learning
          Prediction Models
          Benchmarking
          Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
          Human
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
          Validation Studies
          Ventilator Patients
          Ventilator Weaning
          Prospective Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Infant, Newborn
          Infant
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          Adolescence
          Inpatients
          Scales
          Data Analysis Software
          Chi Square Test
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Random Forest
          Male
          Female
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: Timely ventilator liberation can prevent morbidities associated with invasive mechanical ventilation in the pediatric ICU (PICU). There currently exists no standard benchmark for duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the PICU. This study sought to develop and validate a multi-center prediction model of invasive mechanical ventilation duration to determine a standardized duration of invasive mechanical ventilation ratio. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using registry data from 157 institutions in the Virtual Pediatric Systems database. The study population included encounters in the PICU between 2012-2021 involving endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the first day of PICU admission who received invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h. Subjects were stratified into a training cohort (2012-2017) and 2 validation cohorts (2018-2019/2020-2021). Four models to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation were trained using data from the first 24 h, validated, and compared. RESULTS: The study included 112,353 unique encounters. All models had observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios close to one but low mean squared error and R² values. The random forest model was the best performing model and achieved an O/E ratio of 1.043 (95% CI 1.030-1.056) and 1.004 (95% CI 0.990-1.019) in the validation cohorts and 1.009 (95% CI 1.004-1.016) in the full cohort. There was a high degree of institutional variation, with single- unit O/E ratios ranging between 0.49-1.91. When stratified by time period, there were observ- able changes in O/E ratios at the individual PICU level over time. CONCLUSIONS: We derived and validated a model to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation that performed well in aggregated predictions at the PICU and the cohort level. This model could be beneficial in quality improvement and institutional benchmarking initiatives for use at the PICU level and for tracking of performance over time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N