Capturing the conspiracist's imagination.

Some incredibly far-fetched conspiracy theories circulate online these days. For most of us, clear evidence would be required before we'd believe these extraordinary theories. Yet, conspiracists often cite evidence that seems transparently very weak. This is puzzling, since conspiracists often aren'...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 180; no. 12; pp. 3353 - 3382
Autor principal: Munro, Daniel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173923532&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 173923532
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 180
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        173923532
        10.1007/s11098-023-02038-x
      ppf: 3353
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 677KB
      tig:
        atl: Capturing the conspiracist's imagination.
      aug:
        au: Munro, Daniel
        affil: https://ror.org/05fq50484 Department of Philosophy, York University, S448 Ross Building, 4700 Keele Street, M3J 1P3, Toronto, ON, Canada
      su:
        Imagination
        Belief & doubt
        Empirical research
        Narratives
        Conspiracy theories
      sug:
        subj:
          Imagination
          Belief & doubt
          Empirical research
          Narratives
          Conspiracy theories
      keyword:
        Evidence
        Religious belief
      ab: Some incredibly far-fetched conspiracy theories circulate online these days. For most of us, clear evidence would be required before we'd believe these extraordinary theories. Yet, conspiracists often cite evidence that seems transparently very weak. This is puzzling, since conspiracists often aren't irrational people who are incapable of rationally processing evidence. I argue that existing accounts of conspiracist belief formation don't fully address this puzzle. Then, drawing on both philosophical and empirical considerations, I propose a new explanation that appeals to the role of the imagination in conspiracist belief formation. I argue that conspiracists first become imaginatively absorbed in conspiracist narratives, where this helps to explain how they process their evidence. From there, we can better understand why they find this evidence so compelling, as well as the psychological role it plays in their belief forming processes. This account also has practical implications for combatting the spread of online conspiracy theories.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N