Destigmatizing the Exegetical Attribution of Lies: The Case of Kant.
Charitable interpreters of David Hume set aside his sprinkles of piety. Better to read him as lying than as clumsily inconsistent. We argue that the attribution of lies can pay dividends in historical scholarship no matter how strongly the theorist condemns lying. Accordingly, we show that our appro...
| Publicado en: | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 104; no. 4; pp. 746 - 769 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173975354&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173975354 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02790750 PHZ jtl: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly issn: 02790750 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2023 vid: 104 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 173975354 10.1111/papq.12442 ppf: 746 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 234KB tig: atl: Destigmatizing the Exegetical Attribution of Lies: The Case of Kant. aug: au: Proops, Ian Sorensen, Roy affil: The University of Texas at Austin Arché Research Centre, University of St Andrews su: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Hume, David, 1711-1776 Scholarly method Dividends Piety Charity Translators Charities Charitable giving sug: subj: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Hume, David, 1711-1776 Scholarly method Dividends Piety Charity Translators Charities Charitable giving ab: Charitable interpreters of David Hume set aside his sprinkles of piety. Better to read him as lying than as clumsily inconsistent. We argue that the attribution of lies can pay dividends in historical scholarship no matter how strongly the theorist condemns lying. Accordingly, we show that our approach works even with one of the strongest condemners of lying: Immanuel Kant. We argue that Kant lied in his scholarly work and even in the first Critique. And we defend the claim that this lie attribution, strange as it may sound, amounts to a kind of scholarly charity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|