Strawson's underappreciated argumentative structure.

The orthodox reading of Peter Strawson's "Freedom and Resentment" tends to hide interesting elements of its underlying argumentative structure. Recognition of a distinction Strawson draws between two classes of reactive attitudes raises a question about how the distinct discussions are related. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 1045 - 1061
Autor principal: Sars, Nicholas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174238073&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 174238073
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09668373
        7PU
      jtl: European Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 09668373
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2023
      vid: 31
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174238073
        10.1111/ejop.12815
      ppf: 1045
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Strawson's underappreciated argumentative structure.
      aug:
        au: Sars, Nicholas
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara California, , USA
      su:
        Strawson, P. F., 1919-2006
        Debate
        Analogy
        Theory of knowledge
        Attitude (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Strawson, P. F., 1919-2006
          Debate
          Analogy
          Theory of knowledge
          Attitude (Psychology)
      ab: The orthodox reading of Peter Strawson's "Freedom and Resentment" tends to hide interesting elements of its underlying argumentative structure. Recognition of a distinction Strawson draws between two classes of reactive attitudes raises a question about how the distinct discussions are related. The orthodox reading seems to assume the only relevant difference between the two classes is one of perspective; however, this reading obscures the analogical nature of Strawson's argument and encourages a conflation of distinct elements within that argument. In this paper, I show that an analogical interpretation of the relationship between the distinct classes of attitudes reveals differences between them that have interesting implications for the secondary literature that has developed around Strawson's famous essay.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: European Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N