A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening. SAMPLE & SETTING: 50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measu...
| Publicado en: | Oncology Nursing Forum Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 17 - 24 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Oncology Nursing Society
Jan2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174332372&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 174332372 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0190535X 4F0 jtl: Oncology Nursing Forum issn: 0190535X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 51 iid: 1 pid: 12496 pub: Oncology Nursing Society place: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 174332372 174332372 174332372 10.1188/24.ONF.17-23 174332372 ppf: 17 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A Brief Screening Tool for Assessment of Financial Toxicity. aug: au: Beauchemin, Melissa Raghunathan, Rohit Ranjit Taboada, Alessandra Harden, Erik Solomon, Samrawit Hershman, Dawn L. affil: Scientific co-lead of cancer care delivery research for the Minority/Underserved National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program in the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center and an assistant professor of nursing in the School of Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York, NY sug: subj: Financial Stress Economics Health Screening Methods Economic Aspects of Illness Methods Program Implementation Breast Neoplasms Early Detection of Cancer Economics Health Care Costs Psychometrics Evaluation Human Female Adult Middle Age Aged Aged, 80 and Over Cancer Care Facilities New York Multiple Logistic Regression Prospective Studies Cost Benefit Analysis Ethnic Groups Race Factors Pain Measurement Sample Size Quality of Life Mortality Risk Factors Risk Assessment Patient-Reported Outcomes Neoplasm Staging Cancer Patients Sociodemographic Factors Questionnaires Scales Descriptive Statistics Coefficient alpha Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Summated Rating Scaling Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over Female ab: OBJECTIVES: To explore the utility of brief financial screening items to facilitate the implementation of routine financial toxicity screening. SAMPLE & SETTING: 50 women with breast cancer completed a one-time survey that included the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST): A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, a visual analog scale, and a brief sociodemographic questionnaire. METHODS & VARIABLES: Survey responses were examined to assess the psychometric properties of individual COST items and the visual analog scale by calculating Cronbach's alpha and Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean COST was 21.4, and 27 respondents met criteria for financial toxicity (a COST lower than 22). As expected, all items correlated strongly to the overall COST, but four items (items 3, 6, 8, and 10) performed strongest (r > 0.8). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This study provides evidence for individual COST items to be used as brief screening items. Future research should test the utility of these items in larger sample sizes with a more diverse representation of patients by age, race, ethnicity, and tumor type and stage. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|