A Privileged and Conventional Relationship: Legal Professional Privilege and the Law Officers' Convention.

Motions in the UK and Scottish Parliaments demanding the publication of legal advice to government from its Law Officers have tested the Law Officers' Convention that the existence and content of their advice is only disclosed exceptionally. They have demonstrated government relying on the Conventio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Modern Law Review Vol. 87; no. 1; pp. 111 - 141
Main Authors: Mitchell, Rebecca, Stockdale, Michael
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2024
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174378118&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 174378118
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 87
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174378118
        10.1111/1468-2230.12830
      ppf: 111
      ppct: 30
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 316KB
      tig:
        atl: A Privileged and Conventional Relationship: Legal Professional Privilege and the Law Officers' Convention.
      aug:
        au:
          Mitchell, Rebecca
          Stockdale, Michael
      su:
        Legal motions
        Legal professions
        Juristic persons
        United Kingdom
        Scotland
      sug:
        subj:
          United Kingdom
          Scotland
          Legal motions
          Legal professions
          Juristic persons
      ab: Motions in the UK and Scottish Parliaments demanding the publication of legal advice to government from its Law Officers have tested the Law Officers' Convention that the existence and content of their advice is only disclosed exceptionally. They have demonstrated government relying on the Convention and legal professional privilege (LPP) to resist disclosure. This article provides the first coherent explanation of the relationship between LPP and the Convention. This is that government's right not to disclose Law Officers' advice is based on LPP with the Convention imposing a fetter on government's ability to waive privilege and/or to disclose whether Law Officers' have advised. The article provides new insights into the relationship between the UK, Scottish and Welsh Ministerial Codes and the Convention. The UK and Welsh Codes do not articulate the Convention's exception as applied in practice. The Scottish Code exhibits good practice that could be adopted elsewhere but also creates a variant Convention.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N