Functional Concept Proxies and the Actually Smart Hans Problem: What’s Special About Deep Neural Networks in Science.

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are becoming increasingly important as scientific tools, as they excel in various scientific applications beyond what was considered possible. Yet from a certain vantage point, they are nothing but parametrized functions f θ (x) of some data vector x , and their ‘learning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 203; no. 1; pp. 1 - 40
Autor principal: Boge, Florian J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174479158&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 174479158
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 203
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174479158
        10.1007/s11229-023-04440-8
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 39
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Functional Concept Proxies and the Actually Smart Hans Problem: What’s Special About Deep Neural Networks in Science.
      aug:
        au: Boge, Florian J.
        affil:
          https://ror.org/00613ak93 Interdisciplinary Centre for Science and Technology Studies (IZWT), Wuppertal University, Wuppertal, Germany
          Institute for Philosophy and Political Science (IPP), TU Dortmund, Emil-Figge-Str. 50, room 2.247, 44227, Dortmund, Germany
      sug:
      keyword:
        Automated science
        Clever Hans Problem
        Concepts
        Deep Neural Networks
        Reasoning
      ab: Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are becoming increasingly important as scientific tools, as they excel in various scientific applications beyond what was considered possible. Yet from a certain vantage point, they are nothing but parametrized functions f θ (x) of some data vector x , and their ‘learning’ is nothing but an iterative, algorithmic fitting of the parameters to data. Hence, what could be special about them as a scientific tool or model? I will here suggest an integrated perspective that mediates between extremes, by arguing that what makes DNNs in science special is their ability to develop functional concept proxies (FCPs): Substructures that occasionally provide them with abilities that correspond to those facilitated by concepts in human reasoning. Furthermore, I will argue that this introduces a problem that has so far barely been recognized by practitioners and philosophers alike: That DNNs may succeed on some vast and unwieldy data sets because they develop FCPs for features that are not transparent to human researchers. The resulting breach between scientific success and human understanding I call the ‘Actually Smart Hans Problem’.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N