Effects of a Total Motion Release (TMR®) Protocol for the Single Leg Squat on Asymmetrical Movement Patterns.

BACKGROUND Improving single leg squat (SLS) movement symmetry may benefit rehabilitation protocols. The Total Motion Release® (TMR®) protocol has been theorized to evaluate and improve patient-perceived movement asymmetries. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether percei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 1473 - 1484
Autores principales: Martonick, Nickolai J. P., McGowan, Craig P., Baker, Russell T., Larkins, Lindsay W., Seegmiller, Jeff G., Bailey, Joshua P.
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174574229&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 174574229
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21592896
        BKL5
      jtl: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      issn: 21592896
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 19
      iid: 1
      pid: 38303
      pub: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      place: Indianapolis, Indiana
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174574229
        174574229
        174574229
        10.26603/001c.90703
        174574229
      ppf: 1473
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Effects of a Total Motion Release (TMR®) Protocol for the Single Leg Squat on Asymmetrical Movement Patterns.
      aug:
        au:
          Martonick, Nickolai J. P.
          McGowan, Craig P.
          Baker, Russell T.
          Larkins, Lindsay W.
          Seegmiller, Jeff G.
          Bailey, Joshua P.
        affil: Movement Sciences, University of Idaho
      sug:
        subj:
          Lower Extremity
          Squatting Physiology
          Biomechanics
          Movement Physiology
          Physical Therapy Standards
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Athletic Ability
          Patient Attitudes
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Kinematics
          Range of Motion
          Convenience Sample
          Analysis of Variance
          T-Tests
          Adult
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Ground Reaction Force
          Pain
          Joint Instability Rehabilitation
          Printing, Three-Dimensional
          Motion Capture
          Clinical Trials
          Knee Joint Pathology
          Ankle Joint Pathology
          Kinetics
          Descriptive Research
          Prospective Studies
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND Improving single leg squat (SLS) movement symmetry may benefit rehabilitation protocols. The Total Motion Release® (TMR®) protocol has been theorized to evaluate and improve patient-perceived movement asymmetries. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether perceived asymmetries identified by a TMR® scoring protocol were related to biomechanical asymmetries and whether improving perceived asymmetries influenced movement mechanics. It was hypothesized that participants with perceived asymmetries would also present with biomechanical asymmetries. A secondary hypothesis was that participants would reduce their perceived asymmetries after performing the TMR® protocol and subsequently have greater biomechanical symmetry. STUDY DESIGN Descriptive Cohort (Laboratory Study). METHODS Twenty participants (10 female, 10 male) with self-identified bilateral differences of 10 points or greater on the TMR® scoring scale were recruited for the study. The non-preferred side was defined as the side that scored higher. 3Dimensional motion capture was used to bilaterally assess baseline SLS depth as well as hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics. For the TMR® protocol, sets of 10 SLSs were performed on the preferred leg until their perceived asymmetries were resolved (i.e., both sides scored equally), or four sets had been completed. Kinematics and kinetics were collected immediately after the intervention and after a 10-minute rest period. RESULTS Participants had biomechanical asymmetries at baseline for knee flexion, ankle flexion, and knee moments. Following the intervention, participants had reduced TMR® scores on the non-preferred leg, and this coincided with increased knee joint moments on that side. Although perceived asymmetries were resolved after the intervention, kinematic and kinetic asymmetries at the knee and ankle were still present. CONCLUSIONS A TMR® intervention could benefit rehabilitation protocols by reducing factors of dysfunction and increasing the ability of patients to load the non-preferred knee. Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the importance of asymmetrical movement patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3b
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N