Prediction of drinking water quality with machine learning models: A public health nursing approach.
Objective: The aim of this study is to use machine learning models to predict drinking water quality from a public health nursing approach. Design: Machine learning study. Sample: "Water Quality Dataset" was used in the study. The dataset contains physical and chemical measurements of water quality...
| Published in: | Public Health Nursing Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 175 - 192 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174576483&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 174576483 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07371209 2B6 jtl: Public Health Nursing issn: 07371209 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 41 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 174576483 173796019 174576483 174576483 10.1111/phn.13264 174576483 ppf: 175 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Prediction of drinking water quality with machine learning models: A public health nursing approach. aug: au: Özsezer, Gözde Mermer, Gülengül affil: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Public Health Nursing, Çanakkale, Turkey sug: subj: Water Supply Standards Machine Learning Methods Prediction Models Public Health Nursing Quality Assessment Human Descriptive Statistics Comparative Studies Logistic Regression P-Value Algorithms Artificial Intelligence Random Forest ROC Curve Data Analysis Software Water Analysis Sulfates Public Health Community Health Nursing ab: Objective: The aim of this study is to use machine learning models to predict drinking water quality from a public health nursing approach. Design: Machine learning study. Sample: "Water Quality Dataset" was used in the study. The dataset contains physical and chemical measurements of water quality for 2400 different water bodies. The process consists of four stages: Data processing with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique, hyperparameter tuning with 10‐fold cross‐validation, modeling and comparative analysis. 80% of the dataset is allocated as training data and 20% as test data. ML models logistic regression, K‐nearest neighbor, support vector machine, random forest, XGBoost, AdaBoost Classifier, Decision Tree algorithms were used for water quality prediction. Accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and AUC performance metrics of ML models were compared. To evaluate the performance of the models, 10‐fold cross‐validation was used and a comparative analysis was performed. The p‐values of the models were also compared. Results: N this study, where drinking water quality was predicted with seven different ML algorithms, it can be said that XGBoost and Random Forest are the best classification models in all performance metrics. There is a significant difference in all ML algorithms according to the p‐value. The H0 hypothesis is accepted for these algorithms. According to the H0 hypothesis, there is no difference between actual values and predicted values. Conclusion: In conclusion, the use of ML models in the prediction of drinking water quality can help nurses greatly improve access to clean water, a human right, be more knowledgeable about water quality, and protect the health of individuals. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|