Testing Reflexive Practitioner Dialogues: Capacities for Socio-technical Integration in Meditation Research.
To put frameworks of Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation (R(R)I) into practice, engagement methods have been developed to study and enhance technoscientific experts' capacities to reflexively address value considerations in their work. These methods commonly rely on engage...
| Publicado en: | NanoEthics Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 27 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174602404&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 174602404 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18714757 46ON jtl: NanoEthics issn: 18714757 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2024 vid: 18 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 174602404 10.1007/s11569-023-00450-5 ppf: 1 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 682KB tig: atl: Testing Reflexive Practitioner Dialogues: Capacities for Socio-technical Integration in Meditation Research. aug: au: Smolka, Mareike Fisher, Erik affil: https://ror.org/04qw24q55 Knowledge, Technology & Innovation, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands https://ror.org/04xfq0f34 Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, Theaterplatz 14, 52062, Aachen, Germany https://ror.org/03efmqc40 School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, 1120 S. Cady Mall, 85287-5603, Tempe, AZ, USA su: Meditation Research questions Physiological adaptation Mindfulness Capacity building sug: subj: Meditation Research questions Physiological adaptation Mindfulness Capacity building keyword: Decision-making Exnovation Responsible innovation Socio-technical integration Value levers ab: To put frameworks of Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation (R(R)I) into practice, engagement methods have been developed to study and enhance technoscientific experts' capacities to reflexively address value considerations in their work. These methods commonly rely on engagement between technoscientific experts and social scholars, which makes them vulnerable to structural barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration. To circumvent these barriers, we adapt Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) for broader use within technoscientific communities. We call this adaptation: reflexive practitioner dialogues. While the primary aim of this article is to introduce and explain the methodological adaptation, we also analyze results from a pilot study with participants who are involved in research on contemplative practices such as mindfulness meditation. The analysis is guided by research questions that sought to assess whether and under what conditions the practitioner dialogues support reflexive and practical engagement with value considerations in participants' work. The results indicate that reflexive practitioner dialogues can stimulate reflexive awareness of value conflicts and help re-direct decision-making responsively. We characterize the conditions facilitating such responsiveness as "value exnovators," highlighting the oft-unacknowledged interpersonal relational practices that support collaborative engagement with value considerations. We suggest that "exnovation"—exposing the strengths of given practices for their improvement—can support R(R)I practices by directing analytical attention to their micro-level carriers. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: NanoEthics is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: NanoEthics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|