The Quarantine Model and its Limits.

There are several well-established theories of criminal punishment and of its justification. The quarantine model (advocated by Pereboom and Caruso) has recently emerged as one of the most prominent theories in the field, by denying the very idea of criminal justice. This theory claims that no one o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophia Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 2417 - 2439
Autores principales: Lavazza, Andrea, Levin, Sergei, Farina, Mirko
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174684948&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 174684948
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483893
        1VPF
      jtl: Philosophia
      issn: 00483893
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2023
      vid: 51
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174684948
        10.1007/s11406-023-00683-4
      ppf: 2417
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 649KB
      tig:
        atl: The Quarantine Model and its Limits.
      aug:
        au:
          Lavazza, Andrea
          Levin, Sergei
          Farina, Mirko
        affil:
          https://ror.org/00s6t1f81 University of Pavia, Department of Behavioral Sciences, 1, Pavia, Piazza Botta, Italy
          https://ror.org/02jcvm930 Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy
          https://ror.org/02tyrky19 Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Business School, Dublin, Ireland
          https://ror.org/00mcjh785 Institute for Digital Economy & Artificial Systems [IDEAS], Xiamen University, 15/F, 16/F, Building B09, Golden Brick Future Innovation Park, Jimei District, 361021, Xiamen, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China
          https://ror.org/010pmpe69 Institute for Digital Economy & Artificial Systems [IDEAS], Lomonosov Moscow State University [MSU], Lomonosov Building, Lomonosovskiy Prospekt 27, Ramenki District, 119192, Moscow, Russian Federation
          https://ror.org/01s8nf094 University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
      su:
        Punishment
        Justification (Ethics)
        Criminal justice system
        Public safety
        Consequentialism (Ethics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Punishment
          Justification (Ethics)
          Criminal justice system
          Public safety
          Consequentialism (Ethics)
      keyword:
        Caruso
        Consequentialism
        Pereboom
        Retributivism
      ab: There are several well-established theories of criminal punishment and of its justification. The quarantine model (advocated by Pereboom and Caruso) has recently emerged as one of the most prominent theories in the field, by denying the very idea of criminal justice. This theory claims that no one ought to be criminally punished because fundamentally people do not deserve any kind of punishment. On these grounds, the quarantine model proposes forms of incapacitation based on public safety considerations. In this article, we briefly review a series of objections raised against the quarantine model and propose some new or revised arguments, which are aimed at showing its inconsistencies and weaknesses. These arguments are related to (a) the lack of a reliable way of determining who is dangerous and the consequent need to make judgments about confinement based on probabilities, and (b) the prospect that the quarantine model may encourage certain crimes. Given the arguments we present in this paper, the quarantine model proves to be less solid, humane, and desirable than its proponents claim.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophia is a copyright of Springer, 2023. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N