Impact of intracardiac echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography guidance on left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: A meta‐analysis.

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ICE versus TEE guidance during LAAO on procedural characteristics a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 44 - 58
Autores principales: Diaz, Juan Carlos, Bastidas, Oriana, Duque, Mauricio, Marín, Jorge E., Aristizabal, Julian, Niño, Cesar D., Hoyos, Carolina, Matos, Carlos D., Gabr, Mohamed, Steiger, Nathaniel A., Kapur, Sunil, Sauer, William H., Romero, Jorge E.
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174690498&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 174690498
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 35
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174690498
        173423856
        174690498
        174690498
        10.1111/jce.16118
        174690498
      ppf: 44
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Impact of intracardiac echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography guidance on left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: A meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Diaz, Juan Carlos
          Bastidas, Oriana
          Duque, Mauricio
          Marín, Jorge E.
          Aristizabal, Julian
          Niño, Cesar D.
          Hoyos, Carolina
          Matos, Carlos D.
          Gabr, Mohamed
          Steiger, Nathaniel A.
          Kapur, Sunil
          Sauer, William H.
          Romero, Jorge E.
        affil: Cardiac Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Service, Universidad CES Medical School, Division of Cardiology, Clinica Las Vegas, Medellin, Colombia
      sug:
        subj:
          Echocardiography Methods
          Echocardiography, Transesophageal
          Left Atrial Appendage Closure Methods
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          PubMed
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
      ab: Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ICE versus TEE guidance during LAAO on procedural characteristics and acute outcomes, as well the presence of peri‐device leaks and residual septal defects during follow‐up. Methods: All studies comparing ICE‐guided versus TEE‐guided LAAO were identified. The primary outcomes were procedural efficacy and occurrence of procedure‐related complications. Secondary outcomes included lab efficiency (defined as a reduction in in‐room time), procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and presence of peri‐device leaks and residual interatrial septal defects (IASD) during follow‐up. Results: Twelve studies (n = 5637) were included. There were no differences in procedural success (98.3% vs. 97.8%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42–1.27, p =.27; I2 = 0%) or adverse events (4.5% vs. 4.4%; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.56–1.16, p =.25; I2 = 0%) between the ICE‐guided and TEE‐guided groups. ICE guidance reduced in in‐room time (mean‐weighted 28.6‐min reduction in in‐room time) without differences in procedural time or fluoroscopy time. There were no differences in peri‐device leak (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68–1.27, p = 0.64); however, an increased prevalence of residual IASD was observed with ICE‐guided versus TEE‐guided LAAO (46.3% vs. 34.2%; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05–4.75, p = 0.04). Conclusion: ICE guidance is associated with similar procedural efficacy and safety, but could result in improved lab efficiency (as established by a significant reduction in in‐room time). No differences in the rate of periprocedural leaks were found. A higher prevalence of residual interatrial septal defects was observed with ICE guidance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N