United in disagreement: Analyzing policy networks in EU policy making.
Shared belief systems are generally assumed to forge policy networks. Empirical evidence whether and to what extend shared policy core beliefs create ally networks and under which circumstances shared policy core beliefs are not necessary to form these networks, however, is limited. Based on a novel...
| Publicado en: | Review of Policy Research Vol. 41; no. 1; pp. 59 - 83 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=174818602&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 174818602 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1541132X MJJ jtl: Review of Policy Research issn: 1541132X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 41 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 174818602 10.1111/ropr.12546 ppf: 59 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 519KB tig: atl: United in disagreement: Analyzing policy networks in EU policy making. aug: au: Abel, Dennis Mertens, Armin affil: Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany GESIS ‐ Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany German Economic Institute, Cologne, Germany su: European Union Intergroup relations Interorganizational networks Nongovernmental organizations Belief & doubt sug: subj: Intergroup relations Interorganizational networks Nongovernmental organizations Belief & doubt European Union keyword: advocacy coalitions automated text analysis EU energy policy inferential network analysis interest groups análisis de red inferencial Análisis de texto automatizado coaliciones de defensa Grupos de interés política energética de la UE 倡导联盟 利益集团 推理网络分析 欧盟能源政策 自动文本分析 advocacy coalitions automated text analysis EU energy policy inferential network analysis interest groups análisis de red inferencial Análisis de texto automatizado coaliciones de defensa Grupos de interés política energética de la UE 倡导联盟 利益集团 推理网络分析 欧盟能源政策 自动文本分析 ab: Shared belief systems are generally assumed to forge policy networks. Empirical evidence whether and to what extend shared policy core beliefs create ally networks and under which circumstances shared policy core beliefs are not necessary to form these networks, however, is limited. Based on a novel inferential network approach in combination with mediation analysis, this study investigates the role of belief systems as a link between interest group type and policy preference congruence, ultimately leading to ally networks in the European Union. In order to measure the intervening effect of policy core beliefs, automated text analysis is used. Our results suggest that shared policy core beliefs are a strong mediator for members of the same interest group. In addition, "strange bedfellow" networks between NGOs and businesses do, in fact, lack belief congruence and emerge on issues with low potential for intergroup conflict. This paper makes a contribution to our understanding of ally network formation and adds to the emerging line of research which combines quantitative text with inferential network analysis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|