Does coding internal working models of attachment have to be so hard?
The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) has demonstrated promise in youth, yet widespread use is thwarted by the need for interview transcription, face-to-face training, and reliability certification. The present study sought to examine the empirical basis for these barriers. Thirty-five archival CAIs...
| Publicado en: | Child Psychiatry & Human Development Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 227 - 236 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Feb2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=174877604&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 174877604 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0009398X CPH jtl: Child Psychiatry & Human Development issn: 0009398X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2024 vid: 55 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 174877604 10.1007/s10578-022-01385-w ppf: 227 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 760KB tig: atl: Does coding internal working models of attachment have to be so hard? aug: au: Venta, Amanda McLaren, Veronica Sharp, Carla Abate, Anna Allman, Madeleine Cervantes, Breana Kerr, Sophie Hernandez Ortiz, Jessica Sumlin, Eric Walker, Jesse Wall, Kiana affil: https://ror.org/048sx0r50 Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 4849 Calhoun Rd., Room 373, 77204-6022, Houston, TX, USA https://ror.org/00yh3cz06 Department of Psychology & Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA su: Transcription (Linguistics) sug: subj: Transcription (Linguistics) keyword: Child attachment interview Internal working model Kappa Reliability Training Child attachment interview Internal working model Kappa Reliability Training ab: The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) has demonstrated promise in youth, yet widespread use is thwarted by the need for interview transcription, face-to-face training, and reliability certification. The present study sought to examine the empirical basis for these barriers. Thirty-five archival CAIs were re-coded by: (1) expert coders (i.e., trained and reliable) without access to transcripts, (2) trained coders who had not completed reliability training, and (3) novice coders who had no formal training. Agreement with consensus classifications was computed with the expectation of moderate agreement. Results supported coding by experts without transcription of the interview. Near-moderate agreement preliminarily supported the use of trained coders who have not attempted reliability certification with appropriate caveats. While moderate agreement was not achieved for novice raters, findings suggest that self-paced training options for the CAI may hold future promise. These contributions erode a number of significant barriers to the current use of the CAI. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|