Accuracy of the Exeter Hospitalizations-Office Visits-Medical Conditions-Extra Care-Social Concerns Index for Identifying Children With Complex Chronic Medical Conditions in the Clinical Setting.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the accuracy of a point-of-care instrument, the Hospitalizations-Office Visits- Medical Conditions-Extra Care-Social Concerns (HOMES) instrument, in identifying patients with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) compared to an algorithm used to identify patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Pediatrics Vol. 23; no. 8; pp. 1553 - 1561
Autores principales: Larson, Ingrid A., Zaniletti, Isabella, Gupta, Rupal, Wright, S. Margaret, Winterer, Courtney, Toburen, Cristy, Williams, Kristi, Goodwin, Emily J., Northup, Ryan M., Roderick, Edie, Hall, Matt, Colvin, Jeffrey D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Nov/Dec2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=175060074&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 175060074
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18762859
        8NBK
      jtl: Academic Pediatrics
      issn: 18762859
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov/Dec2023
      vid: 23
      iid: 8
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175060074
        175060074
        175060074
        10.1016/j.acap.2023.07.010
        175060074
      ppf: 1553
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Accuracy of the Exeter Hospitalizations-Office Visits-Medical Conditions-Extra Care-Social Concerns Index for Identifying Children With Complex Chronic Medical Conditions in the Clinical Setting.
      aug:
        au:
          Larson, Ingrid A.
          Zaniletti, Isabella
          Gupta, Rupal
          Wright, S. Margaret
          Winterer, Courtney
          Toburen, Cristy
          Williams, Kristi
          Goodwin, Emily J.
          Northup, Ryan M.
          Roderick, Edie
          Hall, Matt
          Colvin, Jeffrey D.
        affil: Administration, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas, Overland Park
      sug:
        subj:
          Critical Illness In Infancy and Childhood
          Chronic Disease In Infancy and Childhood
          Point-of-Care Testing
          Algorithms
          Child, Medically Fragile
          Primary Health Care
          Pediatric Care
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Random Sample
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Child Health Services
          Health Services Needs and Demand
          Funding Source
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Child
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the accuracy of a point-of-care instrument, the Hospitalizations-Office Visits- Medical Conditions-Extra Care-Social Concerns (HOMES) instrument, in identifying patients with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) compared to an algorithm used to identify patients with CCCs within large administrative data sets. METHODS: We compared the HOMES to Feudtner's CCCs classification system. Using administrative algorithms, we categorized primary care patients at a children's hospital into 3 categories: no chronic conditions, non-complex chronic conditions, and CCCs. We randomly selected 100 patients from each category. HOMES scoring was completed for each patient. We performed an optimal cut-point analysis on 80% of the sample to determine which total HOMES score best identified children with ≥1 CCC and ≥2 CCCs. Using the optimal cut points and the remaining 20% of the study population, we determined the odds and area under the curve (AUC) of having ≥1 CCC and ≥2 CCCs. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 4 (IQR: 0, 8). Using optimal cut points of ≥7 for ≥1 CCC and ≥11 for ≥2 CCCs, the odds of having ≥1 CCC was 19 times higher than lower scores (odds ratio [OR] 19.1 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.75, 37.5]) and of having ≥2 CCCs was 32 times higher (OR 32.3 [95% CI: 12.9, 50.6]). The AUCs were 0.76 for ≥1 CCC (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.80) and 0.74 for ≥2 CCCs (sensitivity 0.92, specificity 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The HOMES accurately identified patients with CCCs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N