Radical Pooling and Imprecise Probabilities.
This paper focuses on radical pooling, or the question of how to aggregate credences when there is a fundamental disagreement about which is the relevant logical space for inquiry. The solution advanced is based on the notion of consensus as common ground (Levi in Synthese 62:3–11, 1985), where agen...
| Publicado en: | Erkenntnis Vol. 89; no. 1; pp. 153 - 181 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jan2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175138563&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 175138563 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01650106 5KZ jtl: Erkenntnis issn: 01650106 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 89 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 175138563 10.1007/s10670-022-00527-9 ppf: 153 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: Radical Pooling and Imprecise Probabilities. aug: au: Quintana, Ignacio Ojea affil: https://ror.org/019wvm592 School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia su: Probability theory Scientific Revolution Axioms sug: subj: Probability theory Scientific Revolution Axioms ab: This paper focuses on radical pooling, or the question of how to aggregate credences when there is a fundamental disagreement about which is the relevant logical space for inquiry. The solution advanced is based on the notion of consensus as common ground (Levi in Synthese 62:3–11, 1985), where agents can find it by suspending judgment on logical possibilities. This is exemplified with cases of scientific revolution. On a formal level, the proposal uses algebraic joins and imprecise probabilities; which is shown to be compatible with the principles of marginalization, rigidity, reverse bayesianism, and minimum divergence commonly endorsed in these contexts. Furthermore, I extend results from previous work by (Stewart & Ojea Quintana in J Philos Logic 47:17–45, 2016; Erkenntnis 83:369–389, 2018) to show that pooling sets of imprecise probabilities can satisfy important pooling axioms. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: Erkenntnis holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|