The simulation argument reconsidered.

Some philosophers regard it as a serious possibility that we now exist within a simulation. That this hypothesis is somewhat probable has been defended extensively by Nick Bostrom. Notably, Bostrom does not defend the conclusion that we inhabit a simulation, but rather the disjunctive conclusion tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Analysis Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 23 - 32
Autor principal: Harris, Keith Raymond
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175416592&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 175416592
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00032638
        7OX
      jtl: Analysis
      issn: 00032638
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 84
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175416592
        10.1093/analys/anad048
      ppf: 23
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 114KB
      tig:
        atl: The simulation argument reconsidered.
      aug:
        au: Harris, Keith Raymond
        affil: Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Germany
      su:
        Iterative methods (Mathematics)
        Numerical analysis
        Iterative decoding
        Conjugate gradient methods
        Generalized minimal residual method
      sug:
        subj:
          Iterative methods (Mathematics)
          Numerical analysis
          Iterative decoding
          Conjugate gradient methods
          Generalized minimal residual method
      keyword:
        existential risk
        simulation argument
        skepticism
        virtual reality
      ab: Some philosophers regard it as a serious possibility that we now exist within a simulation. That this hypothesis is somewhat probable has been defended extensively by Nick Bostrom. Notably, Bostrom does not defend the conclusion that we inhabit a simulation, but rather the disjunctive conclusion that the human species is very likely to die out before reaching a 'posthuman stage', that posthuman civilizations are extremely unlikely to run significant numbers of simulations, or that we almost certainly inhabit a simulation. Bostrom argues that there is no basis for strongly favouring one of these alternatives over its counterparts. The upshot is that it is fairly probable that we inhabit a simulation. I argue that posthuman civilizations are likely to be unwilling to run significant numbers of simulations, thereby undermining the case for assigning a somewhat high probability to the hypothesis that we live in a simulation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 The Analysis Trust.
      item: Analysis
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N