On some recent Fitchian arguments.
Both Jago, in his 2020 article 'A short argument for truthmaker maximalism' and his 2021 article 'Which Fitch?', and Loss in his 2021 article 'There are no fundamental facts', employ arguments similar to that familiar from the Church–Fitch Paradox to infer some substantial metaphysical claims from t...
| Publicado en: | Analysis Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 106 - 112 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175416599&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 175416599 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00032638 7OX jtl: Analysis issn: 00032638 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 84 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 175416599 10.1093/analys/anad063 ppf: 106 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 225KB tig: atl: On some recent Fitchian arguments. aug: au: Small, Julian D affil: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Germany su: Iterative methods (Mathematics) Numerical analysis Iterative decoding Conjugate gradient methods Generalized minimal residual method sug: subj: Iterative methods (Mathematics) Numerical analysis Iterative decoding Conjugate gradient methods Generalized minimal residual method keyword: Mark Jago truthmaker maximalism truthmaking ab: Both Jago, in his 2020 article 'A short argument for truthmaker maximalism' and his 2021 article 'Which Fitch?', and Loss in his 2021 article 'There are no fundamental facts', employ arguments similar to that familiar from the Church–Fitch Paradox to infer some substantial metaphysical claims from their mere logical possibility. Trueman in his 2022 article 'Truthmaking, grounding and Fitch's paradox' and Nyseth in his 2022 article 'Fitch's paradox and truthmaking' respond by using exactly the same kind of argument to prove contrary theses. Intended as bad company objections, these counterarguments cast doubt on the original arguments, but do not actually identify their flaw. This paper aims to fill this gap. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 The Analysis Trust. item: Analysis holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|