The symmetry regained.
Collin (2022) attempts to break the symmetry between the modal ontological argument for the existence of God and the reverse modal ontological argument against the existence of God by drawing on some Kripkean lessons about a posteriori necessity. He argues that there is an undercutting defeater for...
| Publicado en: | Analysis Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 42 - 47 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175416600&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 175416600 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00032638 7OX jtl: Analysis issn: 00032638 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 84 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 175416600 10.1093/analys/anad068 ppf: 42 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 85KB tig: atl: The symmetry regained. aug: au: Lo, Tien-Chun affil: The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong su: Iterative methods (Mathematics) Numerical analysis Iterative decoding Conjugate gradient methods Generalized minimal residual method sug: subj: Iterative methods (Mathematics) Numerical analysis Iterative decoding Conjugate gradient methods Generalized minimal residual method keyword: conceivability modality ontological arguments ab: Collin (2022) attempts to break the symmetry between the modal ontological argument for the existence of God and the reverse modal ontological argument against the existence of God by drawing on some Kripkean lessons about a posteriori necessity. He argues that there is an undercutting defeater for taking God's non-existence to be possible. In this paper, I reply that taking the Kripkean considerations about a posteriori necessity into account does not help break the symmetry. For we can argue in a similar way that there is an undercutting defeater for taking God's existence to be possible. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 The Analysis Trust. item: Analysis holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|