Predictors of Quality of Life of Persons with Physical Disabilities in Indonesia.

Purpose: Indonesia lacks policies and programmes that would reduce barriers towards improving the Quality of Life (QOL) of persons with disabilities. This cross-sectional study assessed the QOL of persons with physical disabilities in Indonesia and identified its predictors. Method: A total of 202 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 62 - 86
Autores principales: Lukman Hilfi, Chiho Yamazaki, Deni K. Sunjaya, Ardini S. Raksanagara, Sekar Ayu Paramita, Nur Atik, Mitsuo Uchida, Hiroshi Koyama, Kei Hamazaki
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal Autumn2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=175518774&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 175518774
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        22115242
        BGWU
      jtl: Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development
      issn: 22115242
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Autumn2023
      vid: 34
      iid: 3
      pid: 20475
      pub: Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal
      place: Jayanagar, Bangalore - 560011, <Blank>
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175518774
        175518774
        175518774
        175518774
      ppf: 62
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Predictors of Quality of Life of Persons with Physical Disabilities in Indonesia.
      aug:
        au:
          Lukman Hilfi
          Chiho Yamazaki
          Deni K. Sunjaya
          Ardini S. Raksanagara
          Sekar Ayu Paramita
          Nur Atik
          Mitsuo Uchida
          Hiroshi Koyama
          Kei Hamazaki
        affil: Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
      sug:
        subj:
          Quality of Life Evaluation
          Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Policy Making
          Human
          Indonesia
          Female
          Male
          Adolescence
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Quantitative Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Sociodemographic Factors
          Field Studies
          Consent (Research)
          Questionnaires
          Random Sample
          Sample Size Determination
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Rasch Analysis
          Multiple Linear Regression
          Data Analysis Software
          Chi Square Test
          T-Tests
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Confidence Intervals
          Relative Risk
          Statistical Significance
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Purpose: Indonesia lacks policies and programmes that would reduce barriers towards improving the Quality of Life (QOL) of persons with disabilities. This cross-sectional study assessed the QOL of persons with physical disabilities in Indonesia and identified its predictors. Method: A total of 202 participants with physical disabilities completed the attitude subscale of Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-Short Form (CHIEF-SF), the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), and the World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) scale. The Rasch model converted the ordinal data to the interval logits scale. Multiple linear regression was used to analyse the QOL predictors. Results: Participants reported a mean WHOQOL-BREF score of 0.12+0.98 (or poor QOL). The participants perceived people's attitudes as impactful barriers (-1.68 ± 1.44). There was a significant difference in participants' mean WHODAS 2.0 scores with poor (-0.38 ± 1.06) and good QOL (-1.79 ± 0.77). The regression revealed the following significant QOL predictors: severe disability (B = -1.089), moderate disability (B= -0.697), employment (B = 0.544), attitude barrier (B = -0.096), and age (B = -0.015). Conclusion: Factors such as unemployment, perceptions of impactful attitudinal barriers, and ageing are associated with the poor QOL reported by persons with moderate to severe physical disabilities. It is necessary to ensure equal employment opportunities and remove stigma in society to promote QOL improvement for them.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N