Relational practices for meaningful inclusion in health research: Results of a deliberative dialogue study.

Introduction: The importance of including people affected by research (e.g., community members, citizens or patient partners) is increasingly recognized across the breadth of institutions involved in connecting research with action. Yet, the increasing rhetoric of inclusion remains situated in resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 1 - 16
Autores principales: Plamondon, Katrina, Banner, Davina, Cary, Miranda A., Faulkner, Melissa, Gainforth, Heather, Ghag, Kiranpreet, Hoens, Alison, Huisken, Anne, Kandola, Damanpreet K., Khan, Shaheer, Silva, Aline Silveira, Oelke, Nelly, Rai, Ashmita, Strain, Kimberly, Sibley, Kathryn M., Wick, Ursula
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=175641711&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 175641711
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2024
      vid: 27
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175641711
        172316924
        175641711
        175641711
        10.1111/hex.13865
        175641711
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Relational practices for meaningful inclusion in health research: Results of a deliberative dialogue study.
      aug:
        au:
          Plamondon, Katrina
          Banner, Davina
          Cary, Miranda A.
          Faulkner, Melissa
          Gainforth, Heather
          Ghag, Kiranpreet
          Hoens, Alison
          Huisken, Anne
          Kandola, Damanpreet K.
          Khan, Shaheer
          Silva, Aline Silveira
          Oelke, Nelly
          Rai, Ashmita
          Strain, Kimberly
          Sibley, Kathryn M.
          Wick, Ursula
        affil: Faculty of Health and Social Development, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna British Columbia,, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Services Research
          Research Concepts and Principles
          Social Inclusion
          Research Subjects
          Human
          Funding Source
      ab: Introduction: The importance of including people affected by research (e.g., community members, citizens or patient partners) is increasingly recognized across the breadth of institutions involved in connecting research with action. Yet, the increasing rhetoric of inclusion remains situated in research systems that tend to reward traditional dissemination and uphold power dynamics in ways that centre particular (privileged) voices over others. In research explicitly interested in doing research with those most affected by the issue or outcomes, research teams need to know how to advance meaningful inclusion. This study focused on listening to voices often excluded from research processes to understand what meaningful inclusion looks and feels like, and asked what contributes to being or feeling tokenized. Methods: In this deliberative dialogue study, 16 participants with experience of navigating social exclusions and contributing to research activities reflected on what makes for meaningful experiences of inclusion. Using a co‐production approach, with a diversely representative research team of 15 that included patient and community partners, we used critically reflective dialogue to guide an inclusive process to study design and implementation, from conceptualization of research questions through to writing. Results: We heard that: research practices, partnerships and systems all contribute to experiences of inclusion or exclusion; the insufficiency or absence of standards for accountability amplifies the experience of exclusion; and inclusive practices require intention, planning, reflection and resources. Conclusions: We offer evidence‐informed recommendations for the deeply relational work and practices for inclusivity, focused on promising practices for cultivating welcoming systems, spaces and relationships. Patient or Public Contribution: This work reflects a co‐production approach, where people who use and are affected by research results actively partnered in the research process, including study design, data‐generating activities, analysis and interpretation, and writing. Several of these partners are authors of this manuscript.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N