Patient partner perspectives on compensation: Insights from the Canadian Patient Partner Survey.

Introduction: There is a growing role for patients, family members and caregivers as consultants, collaborators and partners in health system settings in Canada. However, compensation for this role is not systematized. When offered, it varies in both type (e.g., one‐time honorarium, salary) and amou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 1 - 12
Autores principales: Dhamanaskar, Roma, Tripp, Laura, Vanstone, Meredith, Canfield, Carolyn, Levasseur, Mary Anne, Abelson, Julia
Formato: forms research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=175641811&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 175641811
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2024
      vid: 27
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175641811
        175641811
        175641811
        10.1111/hex.13971
        175641811
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Patient partner perspectives on compensation: Insights from the Canadian Patient Partner Survey.
      aug:
        au:
          Dhamanaskar, Roma
          Tripp, Laura
          Vanstone, Meredith
          Canfield, Carolyn
          Levasseur, Mary Anne
          Abelson, Julia
        affil: Health Policy PhD Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario,, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Patient Participation Psychosocial Factors
          Patient Attitudes
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Canada
          Qualitative Studies
          Content Analysis
          Surveys Canada
          Questionnaires
          Caregivers Psychosocial Factors
          Consultants
          Gift Giving
          Translational Medical Research
          Salaries and Fringe Benefits
          Social Responsibility
          Family
          Health Policy
          Health Care Delivery
          Self Report
          International Relations
          Accountability
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: There is a growing role for patients, family members and caregivers as consultants, collaborators and partners in health system settings in Canada. However, compensation for this role is not systematized. When offered, it varies in both type (e.g., one‐time honorarium, salary) and amount. Further, broad‐based views of patient partners on compensation are still unknown. We aimed to describe the types and frequency of compensation patient partners have been offered and their attitudes towards compensation. Methods: This study uses data from the Canadian Patient Partner Study (CPPS) survey. The survey gathered the experiences and perspectives of those who self‐identified as patient partners working across the Canadian health system. Three questions were about compensation, asking what types of compensation participants had been offered, if they had ever refused compensation, and whether they felt adequately compensated. The latter two questions included open‐text comments in addition to menu‐based and scaled response options. Basic frequencies were performed for all questions and open‐text comments were analyzed through inductive qualitative content analysis. Results: A total of 603 individuals participated in the CPPS survey. Most respondents were never or rarely offered salary (81%), honorarium (64%), gift cards (80%) or material gifts (93%) while half were offered conference registration and expenses at least sometimes. A total of 129 (26%) of 499 respondents reported refusing compensation. Of 511 respondents, half felt adequately compensated always or often, and half only sometimes, rarely or never. Open‐text comments revealed positive, ambivalent and negative attitudes towards compensation. Attitudes were framed by perceptions about their role, sentiments of giving back to the health system, feelings of acknowledgement, practical considerations, values of fairness and equity and accountability relationships. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that compensation is not standardized in Canada. Half of survey respondents routinely feel inadequately compensated. Patient partners have diverse views of what constitutes adequate compensation inclusive of personal considerations such as a preference for volunteering, and broader concerns such as promoting equity in patient partnership. Organizations should attempt to ensure that compensation practices are clear, transparent and attentive to patient partners' unique contexts. Patient Contribution: Two patient partners are members of the CPPS research team and have been fully engaged in all study phases from project conception to knowledge translation. They are co‐authors of this manuscript. The survey was co‐designed and pilot tested with patient partners and survey participants were patient partners.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        forms
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N