Brain Pioneers and Moral Entanglement: An Argument for Post‐trial Responsibilities in Neural‐Device Trials.
We argue that in implanted neurotechnology research, participants and researchers experience what Henry Richardson has called "moral entanglement." Participants partially entrust researchers with access to their brains and thus to information that would otherwise be private, leading to created intim...
| Publicado en: | Hastings Center Report Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 24 - 34 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=175644270&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 175644270 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00930334 HCR jtl: Hastings Center Report issn: 00930334 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2024 vid: 54 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 175644270 10.1002/hast.1566 ppf: 24 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 517KB tig: atl: Brain Pioneers and Moral Entanglement: An Argument for Post‐trial Responsibilities in Neural‐Device Trials. aug: au: Goering, Sara Brown, Andrew I. Klein, Eran su: Clinical trials Social support Counseling Uncertainty Communication Interpersonal relations Trust Brain physiology Deep brain stimulation Neurosciences Brain-computer interfaces sug: subj: Clinical trials Social support Counseling Uncertainty Communication Interpersonal relations Trust Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) Other Individual and Family Services Brain physiology Deep brain stimulation Neurosciences Brain-computer interfaces keyword: dependence moral entanglement neural device neurotechnology post‐trial obligation research ethics risk vulnerability dependence moral entanglement neural device neurotechnology post‐trial obligation research ethics risk vulnerability ab: We argue that in implanted neurotechnology research, participants and researchers experience what Henry Richardson has called "moral entanglement." Participants partially entrust researchers with access to their brains and thus to information that would otherwise be private, leading to created intimacies and special obligations of beneficence for researchers and research funding agencies. One of these obligations, we argue, is about continued access to beneficial technology once a trial ends. We make the case for moral entanglement in this context through exploration of participants' vulnerability, uncompensated risks and burdens, depth of relationship with the research team, and dependence on researchers in implanted neurotechnology trials. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|