Chapter 1: Evaluating Evidence Requires Expert Judgment.

The article explores how practitioners across various fields, such as science, art, and history, establish judgments of evidence, evaluate its quality, and draw inferences, all relying on expert human judgment. Using examples like the authentication of art and battles among experts, the article illu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 112; no. 3; pp. 5 - 30
Autores principales: Shiffrin, Richard, Stigler, Stephen M., Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Pennsylvania Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175657516&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 175657516
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00659746
        2HU
      jtl: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
      issn: 00659746
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2023
      vid: 112
      iid: 3
      pid: 4636
      pub: University of Pennsylvania Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175657516
        10.1353/tap.2023.a918765
      ppf: 5
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Chapter 1: Evaluating Evidence Requires Expert Judgment.
      aug:
        au:
          Shiffrin, Richard
          Stigler, Stephen M.
          Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
      su:
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Expert evidence
        Artificial intelligence
        Philosophy of science
        Scientific method
        Hysteria
        Imagination
      sug:
        subj:
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Expert evidence
          Artificial intelligence
          Philosophy of science
          Scientific method
          Hysteria
          Imagination
      ab: The article explores how practitioners across various fields, such as science, art, and history, establish judgments of evidence, evaluate its quality, and draw inferences, all relying on expert human judgment. Using examples like the authentication of art and battles among experts, the article illustrates the provisional nature of human knowledge and the ongoing refinement of evidence-based conclusions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Transactions of the American Philosophical Society is the property of University of Pennsylvania Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
      holder: University of Pennsylvania Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N