Action matters! Target report technique affects interference between visually guided touch and multiple-object tracking.
When participants carry out concurrent tasks there can be overlap in action plans. This study shows the effects of action-plan overlap in a multiple-object tracking (MOT) task where participants tracked 1–4 targets while touching any items that changed colour during the item motion phase of tracking...
| Publicado en: | Visual Cognition Vol. 31; no. 7; pp. 533 - 542 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=175847588&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 175847588 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13506285 BE5 jtl: Visual Cognition issn: 13506285 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2023 vid: 31 iid: 7 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 175847588 175479342 175847588 175847588 10.1080/13506285.2024.2315793 175847588 ppf: 533 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: Action matters! Target report technique affects interference between visually guided touch and multiple-object tracking. aug: au: Terry, Mallory E. Amelio, Vanessa Trick, Lana M. affil: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada sug: subj: Touch Task Performance and Analysis Visual Perception Spatial Perception Attention Human Female Male Young Adult Keyboards Computers, Portable Funding Source Colleges and Universities Ontario Ontario Students, Allied Health Color Perception Descriptive Statistics Time Factors Female Male ab: When participants carry out concurrent tasks there can be overlap in action plans. This study shows the effects of action-plan overlap in a multiple-object tracking (MOT) task where participants tracked 1–4 targets while touching any items that changed colour during the item motion phase of tracking trial (either targets or distractors in MOT). We manipulated the way that participants reported MOT targets at the end of the trial. Participants (untimed) either reported targets by touching them with the index finger of their dominant hand (maximal overlap between target report and touching items that changed colour) or typed in letters corresponding to targets with their non-dominant hand (minimal overlap). Target report had no effect on single-task MOT performance. However, when participants had to touch items that changed colour during tracking, MOT was significantly worse when participants reported targets by typing them in rather than touching them and it also took participants longer to touch items that changed colour even though these colour changes preceded target report by 7–8 s. Nonetheless, target-report did not affect the performance discrepancy between the target- and distractor-touch conditions, which suggests performance differences between these two conditions reflect differences in attentional selection rather than action-plan overlap. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|