Do Office Reviews in the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services System Do What They Were Intended to Do? Not Yet.
The article discusses the effectiveness of office reviews in the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services System. The authors analyze data from 70 office reviews conducted between 2017 and 2019 to determine the relationship between district-level outcomes and the office review process. The results sh...
| Publicado en: | Federal Probation Vol. 87; no. 2; pp. 3 - 5 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Superintendent of Documents
Sep2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=176027677&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 176027677 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00149128 FEP jtl: Federal Probation issn: 00149128 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 87 iid: 2 pid: 372 pub: Superintendent of Documents artinfo: ui: 176027677 ppf: 3 ppct: 2 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Do Office Reviews in the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services System Do What They Were Intended to Do? Not Yet. aug: au: Lowenkamp, Christopher T. Pratt, Travis C. Holsinger, Alexander M. affil: University of Cincinnati Harris County Community Supervision, Corrections Department University of Missouri -- Kansas City su: Recidivism Probation Offices sug: subj: Recidivism Probation Federal correctional services Parole Offices and Probation Offices Offices ab: The article discusses the effectiveness of office reviews in the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services System. The authors analyze data from 70 office reviews conducted between 2017 and 2019 to determine the relationship between district-level outcomes and the office review process. The results show that the office review scores did not consistently predict outcomes such as revocation and rearrest rates. The authors suggest that changes should be made to the office review process, including the development of a new instrument that aligns with effective behavioral interventions in community supervision. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is committed to improving the national oversight of the federal probation system based on evidence-based practices. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|