Characterizing Speech Errors Across Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Subtypes.

Purpose: Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder affecting articulatory planning and speech programming. When AOS is the sole manifestation of neurodegeneration, it is termed primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). Recent work has shown that there are distinct PPAOS subtypes: phone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 67; no. 3; pp. 811 - 821
Autores principales: Tetzloff, Katerina A., Duffy, Joseph R., Clark, Heather M., Josephs, Keith A., Whitwell, Jennifer L., Utianski, Rene L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Mar2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=176083726&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 176083726
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2024
      vid: 67
      iid: 3
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176083726
        10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00577
      ppf: 811
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 635KB
      tig:
        atl: Characterizing Speech Errors Across Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Subtypes.
      aug:
        au:
          Tetzloff, Katerina A.
          Duffy, Joseph R.
          Clark, Heather M.
          Josephs, Keith A.
          Whitwell, Jennifer L.
          Utianski, Rene L.
        affil:
          Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
          Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
      su:
        Quantitative research
        Speech disorders
        Phonetics
        Stroke
        Progressive supranuclear palsy
        Neurodegeneration
        Physiological aspects of speech
        Longitudinal method
        Speech evaluation
        Speech apraxia
        Disease progression
        Regression analysis
        Inter-observer reliability
      sug:
        subj:
          Quantitative research
          Speech disorders
          Phonetics
          Stroke
          Progressive supranuclear palsy
          Neurodegeneration
          Physiological aspects of speech
          Longitudinal method
          Speech evaluation
          Speech apraxia
          Disease progression
          Regression analysis
          Inter-observer reliability
      ab: Purpose: Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder affecting articulatory planning and speech programming. When AOS is the sole manifestation of neurodegeneration, it is termed primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS). Recent work has shown that there are distinct PPAOS subtypes: phonetic, prosodic, and those that do not clearly align with either (mixed). PPAOS subtypes differ with respect to the predominating motor speech difficulties, as well as disease progression and underlying pathology. Because past studies have determined PPAOS subtype based on clinical impression, the goal of the present study was to quantitatively determine the distribution of speech error types across PPAOS sub-types in a word repetition task and to investigate how word complexity affects the type and number of speech errors across PPAOS subtypes. Method: Forty-five patients with PPAOS (13 phonetic, 23 prosodic, and nine mixed) and 45 healthy controls produced multiple repetitions of words that varied in phonetic complexity. Sound additions, deletions, and substitutions/distortions (phonetic errors) and within-word segmentations (prosodic errors) were calculated. Results: All three PPAOS groups produced significantly more errors than controls, but the total number of errors was comparable among subtypes. The phonetic group produced more phonetic-type errors compared to the prosodic group but comparable to the mixed group. The prosodic group produced more segmentations compared to the phonetic and mixed PPAOS groups. As word complexity increased, the total number of errors increased for PPAOS patients. The phonetic and prosodic groups were more likely to produce phonetic- and prosodic-type errors, respectively, as word complexity increased. Conclusions: This study provides novel quantitative data showing that PPAOS subtype can be supported by the type and distribution of speech errors in a word repetition task. This may facilitate earlier, more reliable differential diagnosis and aid in disease prognosis, as PPAOS subtypes have distinct disease trajectories.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N