Incoherent? No, Just Decoherent: How Quantum Many Worlds Emerge.
The modern Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics describes an emergent multiverse. The goal of this paper is to provide a perspicuous characterisation of how the multiverse emerges making use of a recent account of (weak) ontological emergence. This will be cashed out with a case study that id...
| Published in: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 91; no. 2; pp. 288 - 310 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
Apr2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176098730&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 176098730 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2024 vid: 91 iid: 2 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 176098730 10.1017/psa.2023.155 ppf: 288 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 325KB tig: atl: Incoherent? No, Just Decoherent: How Quantum Many Worlds Emerge. aug: au: Franklin, Alexander affil: King's College London, UK su: Quantum mechanics Ontology sug: subj: Quantum mechanics Ontology ab: The modern Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics describes an emergent multiverse. The goal of this paper is to provide a perspicuous characterisation of how the multiverse emerges making use of a recent account of (weak) ontological emergence. This will be cashed out with a case study that identifies decoherence as the mechanism for emergence. The greater metaphysical clarity enables the rebuttal of critiques due to Baker (2007) and Dawid and Thébault (2015) that cast the emergent multiverse ontology as incoherent; responses are also offered to challenges to the Everettian approach from Maudlin (2010) and Monton (2013). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|