How do speech and language therapists enact aphasia psychosocial support in Ireland? A cross‐sectional online survey informed by normalization process theory.

Background: Supporting psychosocial well‐being in aphasia is necessarily person‐centred, interdisciplinary and coordinated. Shortcomings in such support are described in Ireland and elsewhere. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) are integral; and describing current practice and barriers they exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 698 - 715
Autores principales: Manning, Molly X., Cleary, Caoimhe, McCaughey, Caitriona
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Mar2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176212484&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 176212484
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14606984
        NRNM
      jtl: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
      issn: 14606984
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2024
      vid: 59
      iid: 2
      pid: 52269
      pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176212484
        176212484
        176212484
        10.1111/1460-6984.12959
        176212484
      ppf: 698
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: How do speech and language therapists enact aphasia psychosocial support in Ireland? A cross‐sectional online survey informed by normalization process theory.
      aug:
        au:
          Manning, Molly X.
          Cleary, Caoimhe
          McCaughey, Caitriona
        affil: School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
      sug:
        subj:
          Aphasia Psychosocial Factors
          Support, Psychosocial
          Speech-Language Pathologist Attitudes
          Health Care Delivery Ireland
          Human
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Surveys
          Sociological Theory
          Descriptive Statistics
          Ireland
          Speech-Language Pathologists
          Implementation Science
          Conceptual Framework
          Psychological Well-Being
          Work Experiences
          Professional Development
          Communication
          Mental Health Services
      ab: Background: Supporting psychosocial well‐being in aphasia is necessarily person‐centred, interdisciplinary and coordinated. Shortcomings in such support are described in Ireland and elsewhere. Speech and language therapists (SLTs) are integral; and describing current practice and barriers they experience is important for enhancing service delivery. Aims: To understand how SLTs enact, and are supported to enact, aphasia psychosocial care in Ireland. Methods & Procedures: This is a cross‐sectional, online, self‐administered clinician survey targeting SLTs working minimally 1 year post‐qualification with persons with aphasia of any aetiology in Ireland. The survey questions were charted against key constructs of the implementation science framework, normalization process theory (NPT), and descriptive statistics were applied. Outcomes & Results: A total of 54 eligible datasets were included. SLTs believed psychosocial support to be part of their role, but perceived multiple barriers in enacting it. These included a lack of training, clinical supervision, management support, role recognition, and access to and joint working with mental health professionals and services. Conclusions & Implications: SLTs in Ireland face a range of individual and structural barriers, including care coordination and resourcing. There is a clear need not only for training, upskilling and mentorship, but also for wider changes around access to mental health professionals and clarity around the processes of referral, coordination and integration of aphasia care across settings. These findings comprise preliminary insights into current practices. Further research is needed as well as clarity on best‐practice pathways for different aetiologies of aphasia. Articulating current practices using NPT may have utility for developing empirically informed and principled interventions to improve service delivery. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject: People with aphasia of all aetiologies are at risk of psychosocial problems. Shortcomings in access and the availability of appropriate support have been documented both internationally and in Ireland. To address this issue, an important first step is to understand how SLTs in Ireland currently enact and are supported to enact aphasia psychosocial care. What this study adds to the existing knowledge: The findings describe the potential levers and barriers to progressing aphasia psychosocial care in Ireland. A range of individual, team and structural factors were identified. These were locally contextualized but similar issues are reported in other countries. Linking attitudes with NPT constructs provides a first step for further principled implementation projects. What are the practical and clinical implications of this study?: Addressing psychosocial problems is perceived as a legitimate part of the speech and language therapy role. SLTs in Ireland enact a range of therapeutic approaches but may need opportunities for formal training and supervision, and for better coordination and integration with other mental health services and disciplines. Understanding differences in care pathways across the range of aphasia aetiologies is additionally important given the emphasis on post‐stroke aphasia in the literature.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N