A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief.
Classical theories of reasoning equate System 1 with biases and System 2 with correct responses. Refined theories of reasoning propose the parallel model to explain the two systems. The first purpose of the present article is to give a contribution to the debate on the parallel and default-intervent...
| Published in: | Journal of General Psychology Vol. 151; no. 2; pp. 209 - 223 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Apr-Jun2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=176244046&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 176244046 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00221309 JGP jtl: Journal of General Psychology issn: 00221309 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr-Jun2024 vid: 151 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 176244046 10.1080/00221309.2023.2241952 ppf: 209 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief. aug: au: Fabio, Rosa Angela Verzì, Dalila Gangemi, Amelia affil: University of Messina su: Logic Syllogism Judgment (Logic) Reaction time sug: subj: Logic Syllogism Judgment (Logic) Reaction time keyword: belief Decisional style deductive reasoning logic parallel processing belief Decisional style deductive reasoning logic parallel processing ab: Classical theories of reasoning equate System 1 with biases and System 2 with correct responses. Refined theories of reasoning propose the parallel model to explain the two systems. The first purpose of the present article is to give a contribution to the debate on the parallel and default-interventionfist models: we hypothesized when logic and belief conflict both logical validity and belief judgments will be affected with greater level of response errors and/or longer response times. The second purpose of this article is to assess the relationship between decisional styles and performance in deductive reasoning. Seventy-two participants participated in the experiment and completed 64 modus ponens and modus tollens syllogistic reasoning tasks. Accordingly, we found that belief and logic judgments were affected by the conflict condition, both in easy syllogisms (i.e., modus ponens) and in complex syllogisms (i.e., modus tollens). Findings showed also that participants with a rational decision-making style were more strongly influenced by logic than belief, whereas those with an intuitive decision-making style were more strongly influenced by belief than logic. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|