A 9‐year retrospective cohort study of the monitoring and screening of childhood developmental delay in Thailand.

Background: Developmental delay in early childhood can have negative long‐term cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, along with poor academic achievement, so early screening and surveillance are paramount. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of screening and surveillance on child developme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Child: Care, Health & Development Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 1 - 18
Autores principales: Thaineua, Vallop, Sirithongthaworn, Samai, Kanshana, Siripon, Isaranurak, Sirikul, Karnkawinpong, Opart, Benjaponpitak, Amporn, Wattanayingcharoen, Suwanchai, Piensrivachara, Ekachai, Srikummoon, Pimwarat, Thumronglaohapun, Salinee, Nakharutai, Nawapon, Traisathit, Patrinee, Tangviriyapaiboon, Duangkamol
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176246193&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 176246193
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03051862
        6NX
      jtl: Child: Care, Health & Development
      issn: 03051862
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2024
      vid: 50
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176246193
        176246193
        176246193
        10.1111/cch.13233
        176246193
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A 9‐year retrospective cohort study of the monitoring and screening of childhood developmental delay in Thailand.
      aug:
        au:
          Thaineua, Vallop
          Sirithongthaworn, Samai
          Kanshana, Siripon
          Isaranurak, Sirikul
          Karnkawinpong, Opart
          Benjaponpitak, Amporn
          Wattanayingcharoen, Suwanchai
          Piensrivachara, Ekachai
          Srikummoon, Pimwarat
          Thumronglaohapun, Salinee
          Nakharutai, Nawapon
          Traisathit, Patrinee
          Tangviriyapaiboon, Duangkamol
        affil: Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
      sug:
        subj:
          Developmental Disabilities Prevention and Control
          Disease Surveillance
          Health Screening
          Human
          Retrospective Design
          Thailand
          Infant
          Child
          Descriptive Statistics
          Immunization
          Early Diagnosis
          Early Childhood Intervention
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Background: Developmental delay in early childhood can have negative long‐term cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, along with poor academic achievement, so early screening and surveillance are paramount. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of screening and surveillance on child developmental delay using the Developmental Surveillance and Promotion Manual (DSPM) and the Thai Early Developmental Assessment for Intervention (TEDA4I) for Thai children aged 0–5 years old. Methods: Data were obtained from the routine developmental screening for specific disorders at ages 9, 18, 30, 42 and 60 months conducted using DSPM and TEDA4I from 2013 to 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, and the results are visualised graphically herein. Results: Only 56% of the children were screened for child developmental delay using DSPM. The proportion of children screened increased from <1% in 2013 to 90% in 2021. Suspected developmental delay prevalence increased significantly from 3.91% in 2013–2015 to 10.00% in 2016–2018 and 26.48% in 2019–2021. Moreover, of the children with suspected developmental delay who received developmental stimulation within a month, only 87.9% returned for follow‐up visits when they were evaluated again using TEDA4I to ascertain any abnormalities and specific areas of deficit. The overall proportion of children diagnosed with developmental delay was 1.29%. During the pandemic, the proportion of screening tests for child developmental delay at routine vaccination visits and follow‐ups decreased but was still at least 80% in each region. Conclusions: Since 1%–3% of children have suspected developmental delay, early detection is key to treating it as soon as possible. We anticipate that our findings will raise awareness in parents and caregivers about childhood developmental delay and lead to the implementation of early intervention and follow‐up at the rural level in Thailand.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N