Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Training for Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Resident Education.

Background: Simulation-based medical education has been used in medical training for decades. Rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a novel simulation strategy that uses iterative practice and feedback to achieve skill mastery. To date, there has been minimal evaluation of RCDP vs standard immer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 197 - 205
Autores principales: Raper, Jaron D., Khoury, Charles A., Marshall, Anderson, Smola, Robert, Pacheco, Zachary, Morris, Jason, Zhai, Guihua, Berger, Stephanie, Kraemer, Ryan, Bloom, Andrew D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health Mar2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176256602&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 176256602
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1936900X
        8B61
      jtl: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
      issn: 1936900X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2024
      vid: 25
      iid: 2
      pid: 29816
      pub: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
      place: Orange, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176256602
        176256602
        176256602
        10.5811/westjem.17923
        176256602
      ppf: 197
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Training for Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Resident Education.
      aug:
        au:
          Raper, Jaron D.
          Khoury, Charles A.
          Marshall, Anderson
          Smola, Robert
          Pacheco, Zachary
          Morris, Jason
          Zhai, Guihua
          Berger, Stephanie
          Kraemer, Ryan
          Bloom, Andrew D.
        affil: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Emergency Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
      sug:
        subj:
          Resuscitation, Cardiopulmonary Education
          Simulations
          Interns and Residents Education
          Teaching Methods
          Education, Medical
          Medical Practice Methods
          Curriculum
          Human
          Alabama
          Prospective Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Surveys
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Comparative Studies
      ab: Background: Simulation-based medical education has been used in medical training for decades. Rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) is a novel simulation strategy that uses iterative practice and feedback to achieve skill mastery. To date, there has been minimal evaluation of RCDP vs standard immersive simulation (IS) for the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to graduate medical education (GME) learners. Our primary objective was to compare the time to performance of Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) actions between trainees who completed RCDP vs IS. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled curriculum evaluation. A total of 55 postgraduate year-1 internal medicine and emergency medicine residents participated in the study. Residents were randomized to instruction by RCDP (28) or IS (27). Stress and ability were self-assessed before and after training using an anonymous survey that incorporated five-point Likert-type questions. We measured and compared times to initiate critical ACLS actions between the two groups during a subsequent IS. Results: Prior learner experience between RCDP and IS groups was similar. Times to completion of the first pulse check, chest compression initiation, backboard placement, pad placement, initial rhythm analysis, first defibrillation, epinephrine administration, and antiarrhythmic administration were similar between RCDP and IS groups. However, RCDP groups took less time to complete the pulse check between compression cycles (6.2 vs 14.2 seconds, P = 0.01). Following training, learners in the RCDP and IS groups scored their ability to lead and their levels of anticipated stress similarly (3.43 vs 3.30, (P = 0.77), 2.43 vs. 2.41, P = 0.98, respectively). However, RCDP groups rated their ability to participate in resuscitation more highly (4.50 vs 3.96, P = 0.01). The RCDP groups also reported their realized stress of participating in the event as lower than that of the IS groups (2.36 vs 2.85, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Rapid cycle deliberate practice learners demonstrated a shorter pulse check duration, reported lower stress levels associated with their experience, and rated their ability to participate in ACLS care more highly than their IS-trained peers. Our results support further investigation of RCDP in other simulation settings.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N