Comparing instructor‐led, video‐model, and no‐instruction control tutorials for creating single‐subject graphs in Microsoft Excel: A systematic replication and extension.
Visual inspection of single‐subject data is the primary method for behavior analysts to interpret the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable; however, there is no consensus on the most suitable method for teaching graph construction for single‐subject designs. We systematically re...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 502 - 515 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mar2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176353530&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 176353530 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00218855 NRNO jtl: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) issn: 00218855 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 57 iid: 2 pid: 52269 pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. artinfo: ui: 176353530 176353530 176353530 10.1002/jaba.1053 176353530 ppf: 502 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Comparing instructor‐led, video‐model, and no‐instruction control tutorials for creating single‐subject graphs in Microsoft Excel: A systematic replication and extension. aug: au: Zonneveld, Kimberley L. M. Cox, Alison D. Asaro, Madeline M. Hranchuk, Kieva S. Alami, Arezu Kelly, Laura D. Frijters, Jan C. affil: Department of Applied Disability Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines ON,, Canada sug: subj: Teaching Methods Videorecording Graphics Utilization Software Utilization Human Multimethod Studies Pretest-Posttest Design Students, Graduate Students, Medical Computer-Assisted Instruction Descriptive Statistics Comparative Studies ab: Visual inspection of single‐subject data is the primary method for behavior analysts to interpret the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable; however, there is no consensus on the most suitable method for teaching graph construction for single‐subject designs. We systematically replicated and extended Tyner and Fienup (2015) using a repeated‐measures between‐subjects design to compare the effects of instructor‐led, video‐model, and no‐instruction control tutorials on the graphing performance of 81 master's students with some reported Microsoft Excel experience. Our mixed‐design analysis revealed a statistically significant main effect of pretest, tutorial, and posttest submissions for each tutorial group and a nonsignificant main effect of tutorial group. Tutorial group significantly interacted with submissions, suggesting that both instructor‐led and video‐model tutorials may be superior to providing graduate students with a written list of graphing conventions (i.e., control condition). Finally, training influenced performance on an untrained graph type (multielement) for all tutorial groups. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|