Hidden Inequities of Access: Document Accessibility in an Aggregated Database.
Despite ongoing efforts to improve database accessibility, aggregated database vendors concede that they do not have complete control over document accessibility. Instead, they point to the responsibility of journal publishers to deliver articles in an accessible format. This may increase the likeli...
| Published in: | Information Technology & Libraries Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
American Library Association
Mar2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176369632&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 176369632 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07309295 ITL jtl: Information Technology & Libraries issn: 07309295 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 43 iid: 1 pid: 55 pub: American Library Association place: Chicago, Illinois artinfo: ui: 176369632 176369632 176369632 10.5860/ital.v43i1.16661 176369632 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Hidden Inequities of Access: Document Accessibility in an Aggregated Database. aug: au: Hovious, Amanda Congwen Wang affil: Assistant Professor, School of Library and Information Management, Emporia State University sug: subj: Access to Information Reference Databases Serial Publications Librarianship Information Services Human Audit Random Sample Resource Databases World Wide Web Markup Languages HTML Descriptive Statistics ab: Despite ongoing efforts to improve database accessibility, aggregated database vendors concede that they do not have complete control over document accessibility. Instead, they point to the responsibility of journal publishers to deliver articles in an accessible format. This may increase the likelihood that users with disabilities will encounter articles that are not compatible with a screen reader. To better understand the extent of the problem, a document accessibility audit was conducted of randomly selected articles from EBSCO's Library & Information Source database. Full-text articles from 12 library science journals were evaluated against two measures of screen reader compatibility: HTML format (the optimal format for screen readers) and PDF accessibility conformance. Findings showed inconsistencies in HTML format availability for articles in the selected journals. Additionally, the entire sample of PDF articles failed to meet the minimum standard of PDF Universal Accessibility of containing a tagged structure. However, all PDF articles passed accessibility permissions tests, so could be made accessible retroactively by a third party. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|