The Effect of Delay Following the Clinical Decision to Perform Tracheostomy in the Critical Care Setting.

Background: Tracheostomy in patients who are critically ill is generally performed due to prolonged mechanical ventilation and expected extubation failure. However, tracheostomy criteria and ideal timing are poorly defined, including equivocal data from randomized controlled trials and median intuba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 69; no. 4; pp. 463 - 470
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Frederic S., Shaul, Chanan, Helviz, Yigal, Levin, Phillip D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Apr2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176385399&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 176385399
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2024
      vid: 69
      iid: 4
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176385399
        176385399
        176385399
        10.4187/respcare.10916
        176385399
      ppf: 463
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: The Effect of Delay Following the Clinical Decision to Perform Tracheostomy in the Critical Care Setting.
      aug:
        au:
          Zimmerman, Frederic S.
          Shaul, Chanan
          Helviz, Yigal
          Levin, Phillip D.
        affil: Critical Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jeusalem, Israel
      sug:
        subj:
          Treatment Delay
          Decision Making, Clinical
          Tracheostomy Adverse Effects
          Critical Care
          Critically Ill Patients
          Guardianship, Legal
          Respiratory Failure Therapy
          Human
          Intensive Care Units
          Retrospective Design
          Intention
          Extubation Adverse Effects
          Death Etiology
          Palliative Care
          Comparative Studies
          Nervous System Diseases
          Hospitalization
          Hospital Mortality Risk Factors
          Respiration, Artificial
          Prospective Studies
          Coding
          Descriptive Statistics
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Chi Square Test
          T-Tests
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Data Analysis Software
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Tracheostomy in patients who are critically ill is generally performed due to prolonged mechanical ventilation and expected extubation failure. However, tracheostomy criteria and ideal timing are poorly defined, including equivocal data from randomized controlled trials and median intubation to tracheostomy times that range from 7-21 d. However, a consistent finding is that only -50% of late tracheostomy groups actually undergo tracheostomy, with non-performance due to recovery or clinical deterioration. Unlike in many jurisdictions, elective surgical procedures in our institution require a court-appointed guardian, which necessitates an approximately 1-week delay between the decision to perform tracheostomy and surgery. This offers a unique opportunity to observe patients with potential tracheostomy during a delay between the decision and the performance. Methods: ICU patients who were ventilated were identified for inclusion retrospectively by an application for guardianship relating to tracheostomy, the intention-to-treat point. The main outcomes of tracheostomy, extubation, or death/palliative care after inclusion were noted. Demographics, outcomes, and event timing were compared for the 3 outcome groups. Results: Tracheostomy-related guardianship requests were made for 388 subjects. Of these, 195 (50%) underwent tracheostomy, whereas 127 (33%) were extubated and 66 (17%) either died before tracheostomy (46 [12%]) or were transitioned to palliative care (20 [5%]). The median time (interquartile range) from guardianship request until a defining event was the following: 6.2 (4.0-11) d for tracheostomy, 5.0 (2.9-8.2) d for extubation (P < .001 as compared to tracheostomy group), and 6.5 (2.5-11) d for death/palliative care (P = .55 as compared to tracheostomy). Neurological admissions were more common in the tracheostomy group and less common in the palliative group. Other admission demographics and hospitalization characteristics were similar. Hospital mortality was higher for subjects undergoing tracheostomy (58/195 [30%]) versus extubation (24/127 [19%]) (P = .03). Conclusions: Delay in performing tracheostomy due to legal requirements was associated with a 50% decrease in the need for tracheostomy. This suggests that decision-making with regard to ideal tracheostomy timing could be improved, saving unnecessary procedures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N