The hidden cues of social class: What do people rely on when determining someone else's social class?
We aimed to understand the cues individuals use to assess social class, and their relation to social theories. Participant (N = 235) open‐ended survey responses were coded in response to the following: "If you can at least sometimes tell if someone is (#1) working‐class/poor OR (#2) middle‐/upper‐cl...
| Published in: | Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 73 - 102 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176410132&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 176410132 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15297489 N7Y jtl: Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy issn: 15297489 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2024 vid: 24 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 176410132 174488252 176410132 176410132 10.1111/asap.12373 176410132 ppf: 73 ppct: 29 formats: tig: atl: The hidden cues of social class: What do people rely on when determining someone else's social class? aug: au: Kiebler, Jessica M. Stewart, Abigail J. affil: The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan, , USA sug: subj: Social Class Psychosocial Factors Sociological Theory Public Opinion Human Funding Source Thematic Analysis Social Status Culture ab: We aimed to understand the cues individuals use to assess social class, and their relation to social theories. Participant (N = 235) open‐ended survey responses were coded in response to the following: "If you can at least sometimes tell if someone is (#1) working‐class/poor OR (#2) middle‐/upper‐class, how can you tell? What are all of the characteristics, behaviors, and/or other indicators that communicate their social class to you?" Based on participant comments, we created six themes: embodied cultural capital, material/economic capital, taste, status/position, institutional cultural capital, and social capital. First, we found spontaneous participant responses reflected several classic social class theories. Second, while the content often differed in terms of how participants discussed the working‐class/poor compared to the middle‐/upper‐class, there was only one significant difference in frequency of response. Specifically, participants were more likely to express the embodied cultural capital theme when asked about the working‐class/poor. Finally, participants with some more privileged identities (e.g., racially white, those with higher education, straight/heterosexual participants) were more likely to focus on symbolic or non‐material aspects of class compared to participants with some less privileged identities (e.g., participants with lower incomes in their families of origin), who focused more on material and economic cues in determining a person's class. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|