PATERNALISM, SUPPORTED DECISIONMAKING, AND EXPRESSIVE RESPECT.
This article explores the debate between surrogate decision-making and supported decision-making for individuals with cognitive disabilities. Surrogate decision-making, where a guardian makes decisions on behalf of someone lacking decision-making capacity, is criticized as a violation of human right...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 121 - 150 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy
Mar2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176420018&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 176420018 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15593061 8WVW jtl: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy issn: 15593061 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 27 iid: 1 pid: 53692 pub: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy artinfo: ui: 176420018 10.26556/jesp.v27i1.2926 ppf: 121 ppct: 29 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.9MB tig: atl: PATERNALISM, SUPPORTED DECISIONMAKING, AND EXPRESSIVE RESPECT. aug: au: Barclay, Linda affil: Monash University su: Paternalism Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities sug: subj: Paternalism Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ab: This article explores the debate between surrogate decision-making and supported decision-making for individuals with cognitive disabilities. Surrogate decision-making, where a guardian makes decisions on behalf of someone lacking decision-making capacity, is criticized as a violation of human rights and paternalistic. Supported decision-making, on the other hand, allows individuals to make their own decisions with assistance. The author challenges the belief that surrogate decision-making is inherently disrespectful and argues that it can sometimes express more respect for individuals with cognitive disabilities. The article also raises concerns about the moral implications of prosthetic reasoning, where someone else executes all of the reasoning for an individual with profound cognitive disabilities. The author questions the assumption that a surrogate decision-maker can fully understand and execute the reasoning of another person, particularly those with complex inner lives. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy is the property of Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy holder: Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|