Reassessing the EU Memory Divide: Dereifying Collective Memory through a Memory Regimes Approach.
This article questions the persisting notion that the European Union's memory is fractured between East and West, a notion that contributes to the reification of states as legitimately embodying national collective memories. It does so by building on actor-centered examinations of the EU memory divi...
| Publicado en: | History & Memory Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 140 - 176 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Indiana University Press
Spring/Summer2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176454170&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 176454170 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0935560X 8A7 jtl: History & Memory issn: 0935560X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring/Summer2024 vid: 36 iid: 1 pid: 211 pub: Indiana University Press artinfo: ui: 176454170 10.2979/ham.00006 ppf: 140 ppct: 36 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 342KB tig: atl: Reassessing the EU Memory Divide: Dereifying Collective Memory through a Memory Regimes Approach. aug: au: Dujisin, Zoltán su: European Union Collective memory Memory Political culture sug: subj: European Union Collective memory Memory Political culture keyword: collective memory European memory expertise memory politics memory regimes ab: This article questions the persisting notion that the European Union's memory is fractured between East and West, a notion that contributes to the reification of states as legitimately embodying national collective memories. It does so by building on actor-centered examinations of the EU memory divide, which is manifested in a challenge to the EU's Holocaust-centered narrative by an antitotalitarian memory regime, defined as an institutionalized network of politically driven historiographic expertise. The article shows that the antitotalitarian memory regime reflects a political culture of remembrance centered on a "politics of certainty" that disregards open historiographic disputes and contests the EU's hitherto prevailing "politics of regret." pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of History & Memory is the property of Indiana University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: History & Memory holder: Indiana University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|