The Audibility Problem and Indirect Listening.
There is a strong intuition that we can listen to works of music, yet musical ontologies on which works of music are abstract objects, perhaps most notably, type theories of music, seem to imply that this is impossible. This problem has received relatively little attention in the literature. I here...
| Publicado en: | Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 147 - 159 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Mar2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176495387&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 176495387 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00048402 BHK jtl: Australasian Journal of Philosophy issn: 00048402 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 102 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 176495387 10.1080/00048402.2022.2150246 ppf: 147 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 960KB tig: atl: The Audibility Problem and Indirect Listening. aug: au: Cohen, Wouter A. affil: University of Cambridge su: Musical aesthetics Listening Music theory Attention Performance evaluation sug: subj: Musical aesthetics Listening Music theory Attention Performance evaluation keyword: audibility deferred ostension indirect listening philosophy of music seeing-as types ab: There is a strong intuition that we can listen to works of music, yet musical ontologies on which works of music are abstract objects, perhaps most notably, type theories of music, seem to imply that this is impossible. This problem has received relatively little attention in the literature. I here explore and develop a solution suggested by Julian Dodd and argue that it has at least two problematic consequences, namely (i) that some works of music cannot be listened to unless one has already studied the relevant score or through a similar process learned roughly what the work requires of its performances and (ii) that it is possible for two people to listen to different musical works while listening to the same performance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Australasian Journal of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Australasian Journal of Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|