Actualization of evidence‐based nursing in primary, specialized, and social care settings—A cross‐sectional survey.

Background: Basing practice on evidence is a widely acknowledged requirement for nursing, but shortcomings still exist. An increased understanding of the actualization of evidence‐based nursing (EBN) across different nursing contexts is needed to develop better support for EBN and promote uniform hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 137 - 148
Autores principales: Hamari, Lotta, Holopainen, Arja, Nyman, Johanna, Pukkila, Heidi, Siltanen, Hannele, Parisod, Heidi
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Apr2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176496656&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 176496656
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17416787
        NRNX
      jtl: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
      issn: 17416787
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2024
      vid: 21
      iid: 2
      pid: 52269
      pub: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176496656
        176496656
        176496656
        10.1111/wvn.12701
        176496656
      ppf: 137
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Actualization of evidence‐based nursing in primary, specialized, and social care settings—A cross‐sectional survey.
      aug:
        au:
          Hamari, Lotta
          Holopainen, Arja
          Nyman, Johanna
          Pukkila, Heidi
          Siltanen, Hannele
          Parisod, Heidi
        affil: Nursing Research Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
      sug:
        subj:
          Nursing Practice, Evidence-Based Evaluation
          Primary Health Care
          Clinical Nurse Specialists
          Social Work Service
          Nursing Organizations Evaluation
          Quality of Nursing Care Evaluation
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Surveys
          Finland
          Scales
          T-Tests
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Nurse Attitudes
          Comparative Studies
          Preventive Health Care
          Professional Competence
          Organizational Structure
          Academic Medical Centers
          Health Facilities
          Nursing Practice
          Nociceptive Pain Organizations
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
          Data Analysis Software
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Basing practice on evidence is a widely acknowledged requirement for nursing, but shortcomings still exist. An increased understanding of the actualization of evidence‐based nursing (EBN) across different nursing contexts is needed to develop better support for EBN and promote uniform high‐quality nursing. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the actualization of EBN in different organizational contexts in Finland. Methods: Data for this survey were collected in 2021. The actualization of EBN in primary, specialized, and social care organizations was evaluated with the Actualization of Evidence‐Based Nursing instrument, nurses' version, which focuses on individual and organizational‐level EBN support structures. Differences between (1) specialized and primary healthcare, and (2) different nursing practice settings were tested with Welch's two sample t‐test, the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Based on nurse (n = 1020) evaluations, those working in specialized healthcare hold more positive attitudes toward EBN (p =.021) and evaluated their organization's methods for monitoring and evaluating nursing practices (p =.004) more positively than those working in primary healthcare. Regarding different nursing practice settings (n = 1241), the most positive results were observed within preventive healthcare where nurses evaluated their attitudes toward EBN, EBN competence, and personal evidence‐based practices more positively compared to other nursing practice settings. The results were parallel regarding several organizational structures for EBN. Positive results were also observed within somatic units at university hospitals, and most negative results were within institutional care settings, health centers, and home care settings. Linking Evidence to Action: There is a need for targeted support to strengthen EBN across different organizational contexts, with special attention to those contexts where nursing professionals with lower education levels work. Future research needs to focus on further analyzing the organizational differences and what can be learned, especially from preventive healthcare but also somatic units at university hospitals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N